Comments Thread For: Golovkin: I Won't Say Who Won, But I Fought Better Than He Did!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mirus
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 948
    • 37
    • 62
    • 12,559

    #121
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    nope, Golovkin selected Vanes

    who is not exactly a cash cow

    were you somehow hoping that I would forget about Vanes ?

    Team Bullshht are all about risk/reward, and always have been

    they also passed on Cotto, which was ludicrous..... so they are more focused on risk than reward..... which again, is why they selected Vanes

    and don't talk rubbish about Saunders..... they passed on Saunders to fight VANES
    Sorry, you are saying so ****** things. I lost interest to continue the discussion.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47370
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #122
      Originally posted by Mirus
      You have understanding problems. Vanes was an easy fight to be ready for Canelo on september 15.

      If he had fought a top boxer on may 5 or in june, then it could be very hard to be ready for Canelo on 15th september. He might miss the canelo fight. He wanted big payday (canelo).


      the bold is correct, the rest is bullshht

      1) fcuk Canelo, they could simply rearrange the date..... after all, Bullshhtkin was more than willing to walk away from that fight if he did not get the split he wanted..... in fact, he did walk away

      the very second Saunders said that he would be available in June, there was no other fight to make..... guys like Munguia Spike and Vanes should never have been mentioned

      2) they could have simply fought someone like Andrade in May and easily been ready to go again in September..... stop making silly crybaby excuses


      Comment

      Working...
      TOP