Comments Thread For: Canelo Edges Golovkin With Majority Decision in Action Fight

[marvin douglas]

Canelo didn't win the 12th.


No ****ing way.

He did on two of the judges' cards, both of whom scored the fight 115-113. Had they score it right, it would have been a draw on all cards.

[aboutfkntime]

If you're at the top of the division, what are you, if not elite? Now the CHAMPION has to keep racking up wins to be considered elite? Froch was 35 when he beat Kessler, and was no doubt #2 behind Ward at the time. Holyfield won a title in 2000 against Ruiz at 38. Rigondeaux conquered everything around him until Lomachenko. And Golovkins best wins up to Jacobs are all Martinez leftovers (who were high ranked). You're hating hard for the sake of this age excuse, but it's whatever. I really don't care to keep going anymore.

yesterday, Hopkins said that when Canelo win, the munters will say Golovkin got old..... he said, been in this game 30 years, seen it all before.....

and along comes Turned Up, right on cue lol


also check this out, from yesterday.....

[Beercules]

He did on two of the judges' cards, both of whom scored the fight 115-113. Had they score it right, it would have been a draw on all cards.

No way he won the 12th.

Do you also think he did?

[aboutfkntime]

why do most of the posts start..... I like Canelo but waaaaaah

[doom_specialist]

yesterday, Hopkins said that when Canelo win, the munters will say Golovkin got old..... he said, been in this game 30 years, seen it all before.....

and along comes Turned Up, right on cue lol


also check this out, from yesterday.....

He said Froch wasn't elite. wtf o_O

I get nitpicking resumes when you're trying to prove a point, but Bute, Kessler, and Groves above 35 makes you elite. There weren't even other 168 guys to mention at the time lol

[Tarl of Bristol]

This was a great fight, very close.

Could’ve went either way or even a draw.

I have no issue at all with the decision going to Saul Canelo Alvarez and I was rooting for Trip G.

I don’t think rubber match will be good one for Trip G; he is a couple years out of his prime while Canelo is just coming in to his.

I think third fight happens and I will root for Trip G again but I don’t think it will go well for him, it looks as if age has caught up with him.

[marvin douglas]

No way he won the 12th.

Do you also think he did?

hell no. but that's boxing in Vegas on Mexican Independence day

[aboutfkntime]

Canelo, fight us at 160 !!


ok


FCUK, Canelo..... stand still and fight us !!

ok

Canelo..... !!

yes ?

ummm, never mind

[aboutfkntime]

Canelo stood where they wanted, but Golovkin was firing blanks

[turnedup]

If you're at the top of the division, what are you, if not elite? Now the CHAMPION has to keep racking up wins to be considered elite? Froch was 35 when he beat Kessler, and was no doubt #2 behind Ward at the time. Holyfield won a title in 2000 against Ruiz at 38. Rigondeaux conquered everything around him until Lomachenko. And Golovkins best wins up to Jacobs are all Martinez leftovers (who were high ranked). You're hating hard for the sake of this age excuse, but it's whatever. I really don't care to keep going anymore.

I'm hating? LMFAO. I've praised just about every fighter you mentioned. Just because you want to act like age isn't a factor for whatever personal reasons you want to pretend age in a sport like boxing isn't relevant. Hell this isn't baseball, it's not the NBA, and even in those sports giving a 35 year old athlete anything close to an elite level pay via contract is risky as fk..and that's to play ball not get punched in the face. Sit back for a moment and understand what i'm saying...you calling someone elite and them being elite are two different things. Once having being elite does not mean you remain that, especially if you aren't fighting anyone who is considered elite. Losing to elite fighters also doesn't keep you as elite which plenty of these guys did..LOSE after 35. You don't want to keep it going but here....don't take it from me....use google. Let science explain it to you. So if 20 people in thousands literally THOUSANDS within a sample size we can look at are the exception to the rule does that make the rule null and void? Again, don't let me say it..hit google and do your research and tell me 35 and over is still peak elite level of athleticism.