Comments Thread For: Lampley: Golovkin's Entire Career A Failure If He Loses to Canelo

[aboutfkntime]

Well you finally stumbled on to the truth for once. You're correct when you said Lara wasn't relevant and a draw. Vanes was taken on short notice and Brooke lobbied for the Golovkin fight and was available when the Eubank fight fell through. It was an easy fight to make and stayed in England where Golovkins team wanted to expand their fan base. Boxing is also a business or didn't you know that. That's why Cotto paid Golovkin to step aside. That's why Canelo avoided Golovkin untill he got older and showed some signs of slipping going so far as to give up his title to fight Liam Smith. Your excuses for these guys are laughable. Compounded by the fact that you ignore any dubious actions by Cotto and Canelo. Really your ignoring that Cotto actually said that the middleweight title will now be contested at catchweights only. He considered not paying Golovkin the money he owed him and he blatantly fouled Zab Judah numerous times in their fight.

Tony Baloney.....

that childish excuse does not work..... because on each of those occasions they fought someone MUCH WORSE !

you do understand what " worse " means, Tony Baloney ?

saying that someone is "irrelevant, and not a draw"..... only works if you fight someone relevant who is a draw lol..... not someone WORSE

when you fight someone WORSE, you ducked

even Breadman admitted on the other thread that Golovkin is somewhat over-rated and fell short

here, smarten up.....

I always said that Golovkin is not who they said he was

and I got called a hater

he is a helluva fighter, no question..... IF the right guy is standing in front of him

if you guys want to learn to be smart like me..... then stop making silly childish excuses to justify why your next hypejob refuses to take difficult fights..... hold him to a higher standard

and nope, Ward did not expose Golovkin to me, Mora and Lara did

they made absurd excuses to avoid those guys, and you gave them a free pass

NOBODY is insisting that Mora/Lara would have beaten Golovkin..... just that the excuses they used to avoid those guys, were absolute rubbish..... and that fact was OBVIOUS

and it didn't stop there..... forget Ward, why the fk did Mr "anyone from 154-168" totally refuse to negotiate on weight with little old faded 153lb Cotto?

WHY ?

FACT: when they refused Cotto, they walked away from that fight
FACT: the fact above, was plainly obvious..... THEY KNEW!!
FACT: months later, Golovkin stated that he is willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody will step up..... and that did not cause you guys to raise an eyebrow..... REALLY?

..... the fact that he refused to accommodate a 153lb SUPERSTAR, but was willing to accommodate a 158lb NO-HOPER..... did not raise any questions with you guys?

#levels

I honestly believe half of you clowns knew whats up

btw, it was funny as fcuk watching Canelo beat up Golovkin last weekend

[aboutfkntime]

Yup I lot folks were exposed and had their souls crushed by Canelo. Media, fans, moving the goal post out in damage control and spin mode to protect GGG because he lost and isn't what you thought he was.

Tony Baloney is still fighting valiantly

[aboutfkntime]

I never said any of that ****, man, so maybe you should address your comments to somebody else. But if you're saying you let the opinions of GGG fans turn you into a 'hater' then it says more about you than them. We are each of us only responsible for our own words and deeds.

EDIT: But like I say, I'm genuinely curious to see which way some of the contributors on this thread jump next. Some - and I actually think you may be amongst them, will probably get back to just making positive contributions, others will just look for the next fighter to hate on is my guess... but we will see.

you know it happened, so stop with the righteous indignation

we had to listen to that fkn rubbish for YEARS, and the Canelo ass-whooping of Golovkin was only a week so..... so chill

I did not hear you correcting the fan-tards when they PROCEEDED to bash a dozen BETTER fighters than Golovkin..... quite the opposite

you can keep your righteous indignation

an eye for an eye, so get back to me in two years

[aboutfkntime]

Triple Lumpkin fans have changed from insisting their guy won, to pleading for it all to end

[eco1]

I don't even know what the repeating idiot before me wrote because I have him on ignore, but the problem with this thread is that Golovkin won both fights.

[TonyGe]

Triple Lumpkin fans have changed from insisting their guy won, to pleading for it all to end

On my cell your posts took up the entire page. I used to have a dog that when he saw his image in a mirror would bark at himself. Reminds me of you..

[aboutfkntime]

On my cell your posts took up the entire page. I used to have a dog that when he saw his image in a mirror would bark at himself. Reminds me of you..

on my cell, your posts look like the same excuse-making dribble they look on my comp. reminds me of that stealthradon idiot

[aboutfkntime]

I don't even know what the repeating idiot before me wrote because I have him on ignore, but the problem with this thread is that Golovkin won both fights.

the winner is the guy who could not get his game going, and got his face all lumped up


no, wait..... that sounds fkn ******ed


the winner is obviously the other guy..... the guy who COULD get his game going, and DID NOT get his face all lumped up

[aboutfkntime]

muppets who insist Golovkin won the rematch are fkn pull-hards

[TonyGe]

on my cell, your posts look like the same excuse-making dribble they look on my comp. reminds me of that stealthradon idiot

You can do better than that. It was pretty weak..