CHARLO vs GGG
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin, Should He Beat Canelo, Will Have Eyes on Saunders
Collapse
-
-
SMH at these simpletons complaining about flat fee offers. This fight was never supposed to be a PPV fight, dummys. There's no point to offer anything else than a flat fee. The ******ity on this board is sometimes unbelievable.
If Saunders gets passed Andrade, GGG vs. him is obviously THE fight to make at 160.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostYeah, I don't think he looked good either. And he's been near 160 for a while now, which doesn't bode well either. But I do expect him to be strong early. He needs to charge Canelo and take it to him.
Comment
-
so what if saunders loses to Andrade. does he still want the wbo belt? Will he fight his wbc mandatory. will he go after the belt he was stripped of for not fighting dereavychencko?
Either way it goes ggg is cornered at 160 if he beats canelo tomorrow.
If ggg wins I expect him to move up and fight groves if he wins the wbss.
ggg isnt going near charlo or boo boo
Comment
-
Originally posted by T-1000 View PostSMH at these simpletons complaining about flat fee offers. This fight was never supposed to be a PPV fight, dummys. There's no point to offer anything else than a flat fee. The ******ity on this board is sometimes unbelievable.
If Saunders gets passed Andrade, GGG vs. him is obviously THE fight to make at 160.
so if andrade wins, is ggg vs andrade the fight to make at 160?
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postit is sooooo obvious that movement fcuked Golovkin, just like I always said it would.....
..... they simply cannot shut up about wanting Canelo to stand right in front of Golovkin
..... it is sooooo obvious what Canelo should do, and will do, in the rematch lolOriginally posted by aboutfkntime View Postdon't be fkn ridiculous
FACT: they could have offered more
FACT: they did not
CONCLUSION: they were no hurry whatsoever to fight Saunders
Golovkin is " targeting " Saunders
low-balling, is not how you "target" a fighter..... and quickly running off to fight yet another scrub with NO counter-offer..... is not how you "target" a fighter either
cool story Tom
what about when they could have fought Saunders but selected Vanes..... that is not exactly " targeting " a fighter either..... which puts their earlier low-ball into perfect context..... they made no genuine effort whatsoever to land that fight, instead they made an offer they knew would kill it
And yes, I know he pulled out of the fight .. but that was after GGG had already fought Vanes.
Comment
Comment