what exactly have crawford and spence done thats so much better than porter?

[Madison Boxing]

Is it me or was porter rated a lot higher after beating malignaggi and having his 0 still. Now he's been very competitive with world class fighters he's rated lower? You guys are crazy.

[Scopedog]

They're both unbeaten and pass the eye test with higher marks. More silky skills and one-punch power in both.

Still, that isn't a knock on Porter, who's been around the block and has just gotten a huge win. He'd be competitive with both guys even if he'd be an underdog.

[Madison Boxing]

I'm sure you can see the difference but maybe cause of your hate for both Spence and Crawford must make you abit one-eyed.

Why would i hate them? Funny how I'm seen as the ****** poster yet whenever I pose a reasonable question it's just insults thrown in my direction. What have they actually done at welter That porter hasn't? It's ridiculous for people just to assume they are out of his league, especially Crawford. Can u tell me with a straight face that porter wouldn't be undefeated against his opposition?

[BLASTER1]

How do we even know Crawford is better than porter at 147? Just answer the question.

Well no-one can say for fact can they.
But going of the eye-test and the way Crawford dealt with Horn who in my opinion would match it with Porter is how i got my opinion.

[Madison Boxing]

OP's always been ******ed. Might as well posts in the Boxing Forum 24 arguably one of the worst boxing forums on the planet.

How is what i said ******ed? U guys place too much emphasis on your eye tests, call me old fashioned but you actually have to clear out a division to be considered top dog in my eyes, a win over horn and brook coming off a stoppage nd moving down two weights doesn't suddenly elevate you over everyone else.

[BLASTER1]

Why would i hate them? Funny how I'm seen as the ****** poster yet whenever I pose a reasonable question it's just insults thrown in my direction. What have they actually done at welter That porter hasn't? It's ridiculous for people just to assume they are out of his league, especially Crawford. Can u tell me with a straight face that porter wouldn't be undefeated against his opposition?

It's because in your previous posts your always hating on Spence and Crawford.
I dont think I've read a post of yours saying anything good about
Either of these guys.

[Jimmy 23]

Ggg fan with dumb thread.I m not surpriced

[RomanReigns]

How is what i said ******ed? U guys place too much emphasis on your eye tests, call me old fashioned but you actually have to clear out a division to be considered top dog in my eyes, a win over horn and brook coming off a stoppage nd moving down two weights doesn't suddenly elevate you over everyone else.

Because those guys are better than Porter. I put my money on Spence and Crawford beating Porter.

[Madison Boxing]

It's because in your previous posts your always hating on Spence and Crawford.
I dont think I've read a post of yours saying anything good about
Either of these guys.

I dont hate them

[Madison Boxing]

Ggg fan with dumb thread.I m not surpriced

How's it dumb? He just beat Garcia, whooped broner when people had it as a 50 50 fight, some people scored both brook and Thurman fights for him too. Are Spence and Crawford really that proven against elite opposition? Porter would be Crawford's best opponent by a country mile