what exactly have crawford and spence done thats so much better than porter?

[Madison Boxing]

why are you guys still making out hes some league below them two? based on what exactly? When has porter ever been outclassed and who have them two beat at welterweight thats so much better? You cant compare the version of brook that spence and porter fought and some people thought porter won that anyway, it was very close.

[nubianpiye]

why are you guys still making out hes some league below them two? based on what exactly? When has porter ever been outclassed and who have them two beat at welterweight thats so much better? You cant compare the version of brook that spence and porter fought and some people thought porter won that anyway, it was very close.

Crawford won titles in 3 weight categories and unify one when was the last time a guy had all 4 belts at 140 since it’s so easy

[Madison Boxing]

Crawford won titles in 3 weight categories and unify one when was the last time a guy had all 4 belts at 140 since it’s so easy

i dunno, pretty sure garcia did alright in that 140 division too though and porter just beat him. he could have got all 4 belts if he stuck around too im sure.

[Redd Foxx]

Exhibit actual boxing talent.
If you want a direct comparison, Porter lost to Brook, whereas Spence destroyed the man's face.

[BLASTER1]

I'm sure you can see the difference but maybe cause of your hate for both Spence and Crawford must make you abit one-eyed.

[RomanReigns]

I'm sure you can see the difference but maybe cause of your hate for both Spence and Crawford must make you abit one-eyed.

OP's always been ******ed. Might as well posts in the Boxing Forum 24 arguably one of the worst boxing forums on the planet.

[BoxingIsGreat]

To simplify for you, it's NOT what they have done that's better, it's that they are better than Porter. That's why people rate them higher.

[ShoulderRoll]

They have never lost, for one thing.

And they display a better level of boxing ability than Porter who seems to get by on physicality and a high work rate.

[Madison Boxing]

I'm sure you can see the difference but maybe cause of your hate for both Spence and Crawford must make you abit one-eyed.

How do we even know Crawford is better than porter at 147? Just answer the question.

[Madison Boxing]

Exhibit actual boxing talent.
If you want a direct comparison, Porter lost to Brook, whereas Spence destroyed the man's face.

You're over simplifying things. Whenever Crawford's opponents do badly after losing to him people say 'oh they were never the same' so why can't that apply to brook after getting destroyed by ggg and then moving down two weights? He also gave Spence a lot of problems that fight has been revised a lot on this forum lol.