Bernard Hopkins vs. Joe Calzaghe at 175: Who would win?

**Tiger Uppercut** · 06-27-2006, 02:32 AM

Originally posted by Zab Super Judah

Would the most adaptable fighter in the game today be able to have enough punch output to beat Calzaghe non stop assault?

Let's here it boys

joe isnt just a punching machine, he punches on there face. so hes very accurate.

joe by maybe UD 109-119 possibly

**kbpoetree** · 06-27-2006, 02:40 AM

Originally posted by Zab Super Judah

Would the most adaptable fighter in the game today be able to have enough punch output to beat Calzaghe non stop assault?

Let's here it boys

B-Hop handz down.......Hop is a magician..

**Super_Lightweight** · 06-27-2006, 02:42 AM

...a magician who couldn't pull the rabbit out of the hat vs Taylor

**kbpoetree** · 06-27-2006, 02:44 AM

Originally posted by Super_Lightweight

...a magician who couldn't pull the rabbit out of the hat vs Taylor

man come on now if ya sall the fight we know what happened...and look, it continuez 2day, just ask winky...hbo is given big buckz for this star 2become...

**Dye** · 06-27-2006, 02:48 AM

i like hopkins but he would lose

**Super_Lightweight** · 06-27-2006, 02:53 AM

Originally posted by kbpoetree

man come on now if ya sall the fight we know what happened...and look, it continuez 2day, just ask winky...hbo is given big buckz for this star 2become...

I saw the fight, brother.

Hops ain't winnin' a 'hands down' fight vs Joe Calzaghe.

The 35 yr old Hops that beat Echols would beat Calzaghe clearly.

**JuicyJuice** · 06-27-2006, 04:53 AM

No version of Hopkins would of stood much chance against Calzaghe, and he knew it (which is why he famously agreed to fight Joe for $3mill in 2002, only to ring up 15 mins later and demand $6mill instead! Go figure).

**chammy** · 06-27-2006, 05:29 AM

Originally posted by JuicyJuice

No version of Hopkins would of stood much chance against Calzaghe, and he knew it (which is why he famously agreed to fight Joe for $3mill in 2002, only to ring up 15 mins later and demand $6mill instead! Go figure).

Here here, Hopkins was flatered by an over hyped Tarver. Tarver was flatered by a shot Jones. I beleive Joe was a little flatered by a slow over hyped Lacy. Put all this together and................ well it dont mean **** does it? I still have Calzaghe wining by a fairly close UD

**elgaringo** · 06-27-2006, 05:31 AM

Originally posted by chammy

Here here, Hopkins was flatered by an over hyped Tarver. Tarver was flatered by a shot Jones. I beleive Joe was a little flatered by a slow over hyped Lacy. Put all this together and................ well it dont mean **** does it? I still have Calzaghe wining by a fairly close UD

Here Here Chammy. You my *****!!!!!!!!!!

Bernard Hopkins vs. Joe Calzaghe at 175: Who would win?