Comments Thread For: Hearn: Let's See if Wilder, Fury Both Make it To The Ring
Collapse
-
This site is mostly American based, Wilder fanboys who have been flooding the forum with the 'hype' for Wilder/Fury over the last few weeks.
You people are easy to sell to and manipulate, that's why you spend $75 on sham PPVs.
Many have been swayed by the joint smear campaign from Warren and Finkel against Hearn and AJ. And that's cool, they don't know any better.
But if all people talk about is Wilder, why do all the Wilder and Fury related articles refer to Joshua or Hearn in some way? It's because that's the only thing that gets hits to raise both guys' profile. Without even getting in the ring.
I know you are paid to portray Wilder as some sort of growing entity, in an effort to become the A side, but there are still alot of people who aren't deluded by that. AJ and Hearn bring the hits, Wilder is the water boy with his water boy friends cheering for him.Comment
-
There are far more AJ fans here than Wilder fans. But the "AJ fans" are far more passionate about what Wilder is up to than what AJ is up to. We have thread after thread about Wilder, mainly critical. Many quotes from Hearn interviews about Wilder. But nobody gives a **** about AJ vs Povetkin. Probably because AJ is a 20 to 1 favorite and nobody thinks Povetkin can win.
So which is it? One day you guys rail on Wilder for not being a PPV fighter, now it's that Americans are easy to manipulate into buying PPV. The truth is, PPV is dying here. We have very very few PPVs and only one successful PPV headliner (Canelo, who is primarily supported by the Latino market). It's actually the UK fans being manipulated into PPV. Hearn does PPV after PPV, while PBC puts everything on non-PPV outlets. Wilder vs Fury would be PBC's first ever PPV. While AJ fans buy PPV after PPV. So who is being manipulated again?You people are easy to sell to and manipulate, that's why you spend $75 on sham PPVs.Comment
-
yeah I'll wager with you name the price ?You don't know that.
That usually means things are going well. People go to the press when things aren't going well.
Are you willing to wager on that?
Yeah I'll wager with you it don't happen in November or December ..name how much you want to bet ?
Good for AJ, but it's telling that nobody is talking about that fight. Everybody is talking about Wilder. Where are all the threads full of people excited for this Povetkin fight? A fight where AJ is a 20 to 1 betting favorite. If it's such a great fight, if it's such a big fight, why is nobody talking about it?Comment
-
There’s defiantly some smear campaign on HearnThis site is mostly American based, Wilder fanboys who have been flooding the forum with the 'hype' for Wilder/Fury over the last few weeks.
You people are easy to sell to and manipulate, that's why you spend $75 on sham PPVs.
Many have been swayed by the joint smear campaign from Warren and Finkel against Hearn and AJ. And that's cool, they don't know any better.
But if all people talk about is Wilder, why do all the Wilder and Fury related articles refer to Joshua or Hearn in some way? It's because that's the only thing that gets hits to raise both guys' profile. Without even getting in the ring.
I know you are paid to portray Wilder as some sort of growing entity, in an effort to become the A side, but there are still alot of people who aren't deluded by that. AJ and Hearn bring the hits, Wilder is the water boy with his water boy friends cheering for him.
American big wigs want DAZN to fail so they can keep stringing these guys along with $70+ ppv’s
Only problem is the Kent’s are too daft to see it . More boxing / competition = better fights and more of them . Would green k but I need to spread umComment
-
I do think that it's a little weird that there hasn't been an official announcement yet. Maybe they're struggling to nail down a venue or something. I don't see what else could derail this if money's no issue like Wilder / Fury said.Comment
Comment