Comments Thread For: Canelo Not Interested In Becoming Friendly With GGG After Fight

[markther]

During the episode of 24/7 last night, Canelo questioned GGG’s resume. But their are asterisks in Canelo’s resume. His best win was against a 35 year old Cotto who had already lost to Floyd, Trout, and Manny. His next best win on his resume was against a 41 year old Shane Mosley who had losses to Manny, Floyd, Cotto, and even in Shane’s prime he was digressing after (2) losses each to Winky Wright & the late Vernon Forrest.

I didn’t mention Trout because he won’t make anyone’s HOF or P4P lists or Chavez Jr. or James Kirkland or Liam Smith or Alfredo Angulo or Josesito Lopez or Alfonso Gomez or Matthew Hatton or Kermit Cintron or Carlos Manuel Baldomir.

I didn’t mention Erislandy Lara because most boxing experts didn’t think he won that fight. And he got dominated by Floyd Mayweather. He fought to a draw against GGG and KO’ed a blown welterweight in Khan that can’t even absorb a flush shot from a welterweight without folding like a chair.

And then Canelo says GGG only fights people with multiple losses. The only fighters mentioned above that Canelo fought when they were undefeated or just with (1) loss was Trout, GGG, Floyd, Liam Smith, Lara, & Kirkland. And out of those names I just mentioned, Lara, GGG, & Floyd are really good to great fighters. And Canelo arguably lost to Lara, clearly loss to Floyd, and “some” boxing experts and boxing analysts thought he loss a close decision to GGG. But I will concede that GGG fought a bunch of stiffs at middleweight too. THESE ARE THE FACTS!!!!

[Boksfan]

Bumnelo can take his beating and go back to selling 300k PPVs vs other bums like before. What a cheating diva Alvaroid is.

[chubuk7]

If he beats ggg, i think his tune changes. If he gets beat, well i doubt he'll want to be freinds lol. Human nature

Canelo and his team have made sure their is a rematch clause in his contract though.

[mrlopez]

At the time Trout had just defeated Cotto, he was young, a championship and undefeated.
Yes Trout isn't a hall of famer but at the time Trout was looking impressive after beating Cotto.
So whether you like him or hate him you gotta give Canelo props.
I also read a comment of yours where you said Canelo didn't fight like a Mexican.. You said Mexicans love to see two Fighters going toe to toe.
Well you do know this is boxing right??
The name of the game is hit and not get hit.
IDK why anyone would just stand there and trade punches all night with a knock out artist like Triple g...
Thats just plain ******!
But let me guess you want him to do it just to please you right??
Think about it man, would you do it just to please someone else??
I know you're Mexican just like me but that doesn't mean we gotta go against our own just cause he didn't fight the way we wanted him too.
I never go against a Mexican, no matter what!

Im not sure what you mean, holmes. You just said Trout isnt a hall of famer. I think Trout's win over Cotto was more Cotto overlooking Trout and not being in shape, more than anything. As for my "didnt fight like a Mexican" comment, I was referring to Clenelo's "hay que dejarnos de mamadas" comment when G was SUPPOSED to be his next opponent, and we all know he didnt fight him next, he fought Smith, That was a disgrace!

If he's gonna talk tough, he shouldve backed it up, instead, when him and G fought, he backed up all night.

C'mon maaaaaaaan!

[mcdonalds]

During the episode of 24/7 last night, Canelo questioned GGG’s resume. But their are asterisks in Canelo’s resume. His best win was against a 35 year old Cotto who had already lost to Floyd, Trout, and Manny. His next best win on his resume was against a 41 year old Shane Mosley who had losses to Manny, Floyd, Cotto, and even in Shane’s prime he was digressing after (2) losses each to Winky Wright & the late Vernon Forrest.

I didn’t mention Trout because he won’t make anyone’s HOF or P4P lists or Chavez Jr. or James Kirkland or Liam Smith or Alfredo Angulo or Josesito Lopez or Alfonso Gomez or Matthew Hatton or Kermit Cintron or Carlos Manuel Baldomir.

I didn’t mention Erislandy Lara because most boxing experts didn’t think he won that fight. And he got dominated by Floyd Mayweather. He fought to a draw against GGG and KO’ed a blown welterweight in Khan that can’t even absorb a flush shot from a welterweight without folding like a chair.

And then Canelo says GGG only fights people with multiple losses. The only fighters mentioned above that Canelo fought when they were undefeated or just with (1) loss was Trout, GGG, Floyd, Liam Smith, Lara, & Kirkland. And out of those names I just mentioned, Lara, GGG, & Floyd are really good to great fighters. And Canelo arguably lost to Lara, clearly loss to Floyd, and “some” boxing experts and boxing analysts thought he loss a close decision to GGG. But I will concede that GGG fought a bunch of stiffs at middleweight too. THESE ARE THE FACTS!!!!

You typed all of this but that doesn't negate the fact that Canelo has a better resume. His wins over trout, lara and cotto are better than every win that GGG has.

[whoseyourdaddy]

Im not sure what you mean, holmes. You just said Trout isnt a hall of famer. I think Trout's win over Cotto was more Cotto overlooking Trout and not being in shape, more than anything. As for my "didnt fight like a Mexican" comment, I was referring to Clenelo's "hay que dejarnos de mamadas" comment when G was SUPPOSED to be his next opponent, and we all know he didnt fight him next, he fought Smith, That was a disgrace!

If he's gonna talk tough, he shouldve backed it up, instead, when him and G fought, he backed up all night.

C'mon maaaaaaaan!

GGG backed up what exactly? Didn't they said (GGG's team) he was gonna KO Canelo in Seven? fight Mexican style? did he use the hook to the body (a true Mexican style/signature punch)? did he press the action when Canelo was on the ropes? a true Mexican style boxer would have done all that. they promise things and did not deliver, that's the bottom line.

[Jsmooth9876]

I'd say they should go out and grab a beer and a steak but we know how that would end up

[whoseyourdaddy]

During the episode of 24/7 last night, Canelo questioned GGG’s resume. But their are asterisks in Canelo’s resume. His best win was against a 35 year old Cotto who had already lost to Floyd, Trout, and Manny. His next best win on his resume was against a 41 year old Shane Mosley who had losses to Manny, Floyd, Cotto, and even in Shane’s prime he was digressing after (2) losses each to Winky Wright & the late Vernon Forrest.

I didn’t mention Trout because he won’t make anyone’s HOF or P4P lists or Chavez Jr. or James Kirkland or Liam Smith or Alfredo Angulo or Josesito Lopez or Alfonso Gomez or Matthew Hatton or Kermit Cintron or Carlos Manuel Baldomir.

I didn’t mention Erislandy Lara because most boxing experts didn’t think he won that fight. And he got dominated by Floyd Mayweather. He fought to a draw against GGG and KO’ed a blown welterweight in Khan that can’t even absorb a flush shot from a welterweight without folding like a chair.

And then Canelo says GGG only fights people with multiple losses. The only fighters mentioned above that Canelo fought when they were undefeated or just with (1) loss was Trout, GGG, Floyd, Liam Smith, Lara, & Kirkland. And out of those names I just mentioned, Lara, GGG, & Floyd are really good to great fighters. And Canelo arguably lost to Lara, clearly loss to Floyd, and “some” boxing experts and boxing analysts thought he loss a close decision to GGG. But I will concede that GGG fought a bunch of stiffs at middleweight too. THESE ARE THE FACTS!!!!

What boxing experts are you talking about? because of the list of boxing experts (trainers, boxers and sports writers) 82 out of 88 had Canelo over Lara.


I guess you consulted Lara's family and friends down in Miami lol

[MisanthropicNY]

Problem is, those tactics have worked well for them for hundreds of thousands of years. LOL...

LOL. Glad you are woke, my Red Pill brother.

[BigStomps]

Im not sure what you mean, holmes. You just said Trout isnt a hall of famer. I think Trout's win over Cotto was more Cotto overlooking Trout and not being in shape, more than anything. As for my "didnt fight like a Mexican" comment, I was referring to Clenelo's "hay que dejarnos de mamadas" comment when G was SUPPOSED to be his next opponent, and we all know he didnt fight him next, he fought Smith, That was a disgrace!

If he's gonna talk tough, he shouldve backed it up, instead, when him and G fought, he backed up all night.

C'mon maaaaaaaan!

I'm sure you know all the B.S that was going on behind closed doors in regards to Canelo and the lawsuit he had against him by his previous promoter.. How can anyone negotiate a deal when he don't even know who's gonna be his promoter in a couple of month's time?? But you're absolutely right on that. Canelo did **** up by saying that. He shouldn't of said that if he wasn't positive Triple g was next..
But you seem to remember everything that goes on with canelo but you fail to admit your idol Triple g did the same thing...
Didn't he say his goal was to own all the belts??
Well why didn't he fight Sergei Devrechnko in May? Why did he chose to fight Vanes instead??
He knew he was gonna get stripped If he didn't fight Sergei next so why didn't he just get his mandatory out of the way instead of fighting Vanes??
You Triple g fans seem to have selective memory... You guys choose what to believe.
But it's cool. I'm just wondering what kind of excuses you gonna come up with If Canelo clearly beats Triple g in a couple of weeks...
Are you gonna give him his props or are you gonna make excuses and not give Canelo his props??