Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo's Trainers: We Clearly Beat Golovkin in First Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I also thought canelo clearly won.

    He outlanded him, landed harder shots, outboxed him, and was more in control.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DocGreenThumb. View Post
      So you forgot about GGG's jab the whole fight. You know the one that was in Conellos face. The punch he beat him with. We are not talking about Jeff Horn get your fighters and fights straight. Big difference We all know who won and who was gifted a decision. Even though he missed he still landed more punches than Conello your blindness.

      nope, you forgot that defence is valid scoring criteria

      Comment


      • Originally posted by j.razor View Post
        Nelo clearly won. It simple, just watch who is landing the punches cuz lil g wasn't.
        I've already learned not to pay attention to you. You're either a troll or have such a primitive sense of boxing that discussing the fight with you is a complete waste of time.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post
          Thank god you're not a judge. These kind of comments are absolutely ridiculous and belong in the trolling section.
          ???

          If all 3 judges gave Canelo rounds 2, 3, 10, 11, and 12 - meaning 15/15...than Canelo had at least 5 rounds to start.

          Winning a single other round warranted a draw and winning a 2nd round warranted a victory.

          What is confusing???

          Canelo defended better, landed the better punches, was in better shape after the fight (less bruising)...I mean what do you judge by??? Activity and jab??? If that's the case than yes Gennady won...but it's not the case lol

          How do you throw 100 more punches and land less? Get beat up by a smaller fighter? And not know how to defend/aggro a guy who only fights in spurts?

          Sorry. Gennady was not the better man. Sadly lots of people let their bias influence decisions. Just because Gennady went forward, threw a lot, and ate a lot of flush punches while missing more than he ever has...does not mean he won.

          Canelo prefers to fight going backward - hell even Liam Smith "pushed Canelo back" as did Kirkland and Amir Khan (lol) at times. Canelo honestly has a preference for fighting off the backfoot.

          Stunning how upset Genady fans become over legitimizing his first loss (gift draw tbh)
          Last edited by Bjl12; 08-28-2018, 11:15 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by j.razor View Post
            Then why did they rob Hopkins vs Taylor?
            Somebody paid somebody to make that happen. Doesn't make it right though.

            Comment


            • Lots of talk but the questions people want to know aren't ever asked?
              We know nelo wants people to believe he thinks he beat GGG. But has anyone ever actually put it to nelo that on night general consensus was people thought GGG was robbed or to not offend anyone, won?
              Has anyone queried nelo idea he beat ggg

              Comment


              • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                Lots of talk but the questions people want to know aren't ever asked?
                We know nelo wants people to believe he thinks he beat GGG. But has anyone ever actually put it to nelo that on night general consensus was people thought GGG was robbed or to not offend anyone, won?
                Has anyone queried nelo idea he beat ggg


                " general consensus "

                never underestimate the power of ****** people in large groups

                the hoards of casuals who watched that fight now know how to score

                defence is valid scoring criteria, missing wildly is not

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JWHardin View Post
                  Like I have said before, Canelo is either clearly guilty of taking PEDs, or is one of the dumbest boxers of the 21st century.

                  Which is it Canelo fans?
                  Both maybe?!?...just kidding...it has to be one or the other though! Either way it will never look good for him....the contaminated meat was on public notice for over the past 8 yrs. How could that be ignored in his profession?!? Sad.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
                    ???

                    If all 3 judges gave Canelo rounds 2, 3, 10, 11, and 12 - meaning 15/15...than Canelo had at least 5 rounds to start.

                    Winning a single other round warranted a draw and winning a 2nd round warranted a victory.

                    What is confusing???

                    Canelo defended better, landed the better punches, was in better shape after the fight (less bruising)...I mean what do you judge by??? Activity and jab??? If that's the case than yes Gennady won...but it's not the case lol

                    How do you throw 100 more punches and land less? Get beat up by a smaller fighter? And not know how to defend/aggro a guy who only fights in spurts?

                    Sorry. Gennady was not the better man. Sadly lots of people let their bias influence decisions. Just because Gennady went forward, threw a lot, and ate a lot of flush punches while missing more than he ever has...does not mean he won.

                    Canelo prefers to fight going backward - hell even Liam Smith "pushed Canelo back" as did Kirkland and Amir Khan (lol) at times. Canelo honestly has a preference for fighting off the backfoot.

                    Stunning how upset Genady fans become over legitimizing his first loss (gift draw tbh)
                    What's confusing is you quote the judges as gospel but say Canelo won when the judges ruled it a draw. In other words you don't agree with the judges scoring. Neither do we and 80% of other observers.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by lion33lit View Post
                      Both maybe?!?...just kidding...it has to be one or the other though! Either way it will never look good for him....the contaminated meat was on public notice for over the past 8 yrs. How could that be ignored in his profession?!? Sad.

                      coz he was hungry ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP