Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin Still Has Time To Enhance His Legacy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    After Sept. 15th YOU are going bye bye! Getting rid of idiots like you is FUN! Just remember loser why you won't have an account. Bacause YOU dont know SHT about boxing...
    Canelo couldnt beat Golovkin even while being on the juice. Hope GGG sparks him out this time.

    Comment


    • #52
      I think the assessment of GGG's resume is quite unfair. Andre Ward and Sergey Kovalev's respective resume's weren't great, and a great many unified belt holders remain questionable.
      People forget Daniel Geale has been a recent two-time MW champion, Lemieux held the IBF belt when GGG simply out-jabbed him in what was meant to be a war, and yes most of the other opponents fed to GGG have mostly been contenders.
      But who's fault is that? Before the Jacobs fight, Golovkin was the most avoided fighter in boxing, he liked to stay busy back then so fought whoever was put in front of him.
      If he beats Canelo convincingly this time will people finally leave his resume alone? Or does he have to beat BJS, Charlo, and Derevyanchenko before people give him kudos?

      Comment


      • #53
        Should've fought Ward @ 168 when he had the chance! Beat Canelo, Charlo, and then think about Benavidez, Groves, and Zurdo @ 168! Dominating 2 divisions would be an ATG legacy!
        Last edited by Bronx2245; 08-25-2018, 08:23 AM.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
          His resume is pretty poor.

          His best and only real top level win was against Jacobs and IMO he lost that fight.
          Dude, take this pile of **** back where you bought it and get your money back.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
            Dude, take this pile of **** back where you bought it and get your money back.
            Money back for what?

            What am I taking back?

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              Money back for what?

              What am I taking back?
              That steaming pile of dog ***** you brought. "His best and only real top level win was against Jacobs and IMO he lost that fight."

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
                That steaming pile of dog ***** you brought. "His best and only real top level win was against Jacobs and IMO he lost that fight. "
                What am I supposed to do take my words back to the shop? Is this your attempt at some kind of wit?

                It is though. What other top level wins does he have?

                I have no issue with Golovkin winning because the fight was very close. What are you saying? That it wasn't close?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Kiowhatta View Post
                  I think the assessment of GGG's resume is quite unfair. Andre Ward and Sergey Kovalev's respective resume's weren't great, and a great many unified belt holders remain questionable.
                  People forget Daniel Geale has been a recent two-time MW champion, Lemieux held the IBF belt when GGG simply out-jabbed him in what was meant to be a war, and yes most of the other opponents fed to GGG have mostly been contenders.
                  But who's fault is that? Before the Jacobs fight, Golovkin was the most avoided fighter in boxing, he liked to stay busy back then so fought whoever was put in front of him.
                  If he beats Canelo convincingly this time will people finally leave his resume alone? Or does he have to beat BJS, Charlo, and Derevyanchenko before people give him kudos?
                  Actually no. We can't base his whole resume on one fighter, a fighter he drew with in their first fight. He didn't beat anyone worthwhile convincingly. Until Jacobs, his opponents were pedestrian. Even Jacobs himself is a C+ or B- fighter. Some thought Golovkin lost that fight. GGG should have lost the Lemieux fight by disqualification (hitting him while on one knee). He was gifted some of his belts.

                  I could care less who avoided him as well. You can't count those. Those fights never happened for one reason or another, similar to GGG's duckings of Ward and Derevyanchenko.

                  Geale? I won't even go there!

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
                    Floyd fought a younger, fresher Canelo when Floyd was 36.
                    This fire red beard was on steroids and couldn’t even make GGG blink with his huge shots. I feel he’s in for a world of agony. Golovkin won the first fight and will win again by K.O. 100%, take it to the bank!

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
                      That steaming pile of dog ***** you brought. "His best and only real top level win was against Jacobs and IMO he lost that fight."
                      He wasnt lying. He's not like you

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP