Comments Thread For: Porter: Terence Crawford is already one of the best welterweights
Collapse
-
-
Yes he had a long listed resume at fighting at 135.
Most Great fighters move up 10-15 pounds with no problem when there young. Greatness can be brought across. It really depends how much they struggle to make weightComment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I agree with most of what you said but no way in hell is Brook a better fighter than Crawford. I think Crawford beats Porter easier than Brook did and possibly by knock out in the later rounds. Crawford just beat the Australian version of Porter. He wouldn't have any problem getting out of the way of Shawn's head and bull rushes. Porter would be missing and getting tired until Bud starts timing him and breaking him down.I love them both and WE see TC got the goods but we could play devil's advocate with this one tho one... I'll say a Kell Brook is a better fighter than TC best win which to me would be Burns i guess. They both went over to snatch up belts but TC at lightweight i think. So TC hasn't faced a True Welterweight yet ( Not talking weight::: Skills, IQ etc..) Your point taking tho, I just hate they gotta fight.Comment
-
The fact that you can't see what makes Bud such a good boxer shows how little insight you have into the sport. I'd suggest watching something with much less subtlety and nuance. WWE perhaps?Comment
-
Comment
-
Go **** yourself you casual ****. Your eye test doesn't prove ****... a resume and actually fighting top guys does. Crawford has a garbage resume and hasn't fought a single active A class or higher opponent his size. I can't help these facts don't line up with your delusion. I like fighters that are resume proven and not some hype job beating bums... but da eye test doe
Comment
Comment