Tweet
The laugh sort of told it all for how Ward thinks of it. It'll be interesting...Canelo will be off the gear and tested 4 months out instead of 2, so you'll have to see if the stamina issues return, not to mention the power won't be the same (not to say it'll be non-existent), and Golovkin is another year older into his mid 30's, so you'll have to see if he's another year not as sharp and doesn't cut off the ring again.
-
-
This is exactly where I am with it. Obviously it isn't always the case.Historically, the guy who can do more and has more tricks in his bag typically do better in the rematch.Comment
-
Yawn. He also picked Canelo to beat him in the first fight. Just like Floyd said Canelo beats Golovkin easy and knocks him out.
Newsflash - when boxers had some sort of beef with whoever they're talking about, they very rarely talk with their brains.Comment
-
-
Honestly Canelo cant do no better than what he already did if thats the case... he would of took over the fight, he gasses out early... as you saw in the first fight, I got triple G winning.Comment
-
[/I]Best example i can think of that goes against this theory is Chocolatito - Rungvisai, chocolatito the more complete fighter IMO but Rungvisai flattened him in the rematch!Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
Best example i can think of which supports the Theory is Duran-Leonard!Comment
-
if canelo does rise to the occasion it would be great if he could do it cleanly and without controversy, without needing corrupt officials or incompetent refs to help them get over the line (unlike u mr. ward)Comment
-
I wonder why Ward sympathizes with Canelo being accused of cheating? (he wasn't just accused, he was proven to have cheated)Comment
-
Ward, Froch, Mayweather, they always pick against GGG. Nothing to see here.
https://teespring.com/gennady-ggg-go...2397&sid=frontComment
Comment