No offense meant but you don't have a top 100 all time great list all written down in neat order from the 1st best to the 100th best. Nobody reading this thread does either. Maybe a few have a top 10 all time great list but that is as long as such lists ever go. Without a written list nobody has a mental list of the top 100 either. To make an honest reasonably accurate list you would need a working knowledge of all the great fighters of the last 100 years or so. How many reading this have such knowledge? NONE. What you are really asking is for us to make a wild guess if he would belong in the top 100 boxers of all time without any real idea if our answer is accurate or not. If you can list the names of the 100 best boxers of all time then I can give you my guess as to if he would belong in the top 100 if he won those fights. Otherwise I can't answer your question because I have no idea who the 100 best boxers of all time really are. Do you?
I gave you green k because it is an utter shame that they are calling Loma a HOF fighter right now. Utter shame lmao. It's a disrespect to the careers of great fighters who have achieved so much more than he has. Shame...
175, Spinks,Archie Moore,langford?? in all the years of the sport I just dont feel he is unbeatable as I have seen him dropped by a nobody
Originally posted by chrisJS
At 175 I think he'd lose to Spinks, Charles, Moore, Langford and I think Tunney, Conn, Foster and Loughran CAN beat him.
At 168 I think he'd be heavily favored over all but that division is 30 years old. At 160 it's hard to say because his championship sample size is smaller but Monzon, Tiger and Hagler would be more than a match for him.
Tweet
Comment