Comments Thread For: Joshua Ordered By WBO To Make Mandatory After Povetkin

[PotentialToast]

Not immediate. More problematic. Can't see H Fury stepping aside when he will be on 1/4 of the money generated in a UK summer blockbuster.

[PotentialToast]

But makes Miller v Whyte a nice fight for Dec / Jan. Hope the WBO order this as WBO final eliminator.

[PotentialToast]

You remember this AJ. The longer Eddie protecting you, the more time that your fear and doubts can grow. Boxing a business, but a sport as well too. Those who challenge themselves grow stronger. Those who dont become soft. No matter how many of them bums you topple, you aint never gonna be ready for the velocity, the artillery, and the ingenuity of Deontay the Bronze Bomber Wilder, five-star general of the squared circle.

Comical coming from the sheer number of top 10 ring that WBC paper champ has fought. That said, looking forward to the T Fury fight (if it happens)

[Chrismart]

But makes Miller v Whyte a nice fight for Dec / Jan. Hope the WBO order this as WBO final eliminator.

Yeah I'd like to see that fight too.

[Oshio]

This Wilder fanboys don't really think. What are you guys? Robots? True You keep blaming Hearn and calling him out without looking at Finkel and Co and pointing to how they derailed the Joshua-Wilder fight. Or, are you guys saying Finkel and Haymon are saints? Inasmuch as Hearn is a terrible individual, Finkel and Haymon are no saints

[bigjavi973]

HEAVYWEIGHT (Over 201 lbs) ( Over 91.17 kgs)
Title Name Country Note
CHAMPION ANTHONY JOSHUA UK
1 Alexander Povetkin (International) RUS
2 Dillian Whyte JAM
3 Jarrell Miller USA
4 Tom Schwarz (Int-Cont) GER
5 Dominic Breazeale USA

http://www.wboboxing.com/rankings

??????

[juggernaut666]

Do do you think this ruling is random? Seems odd that the WBO would say that a mandatory, that they haven't even named yet, would need to take place within such a time frame. Why would they even make a statement about it.

If you can't answer without making some obtuse Wilder reference then nothing you say can be trusted because your goal is just to smear one fighter while elevating another.

It doesnt matter if they named anyone bc they may decide to make a final eliminator .


They wouldn't name Povetkin a mandatory NOW .

Why would they do that if they can get another sanctioning fee ? They would have made Povetkin a mandatory months ago if that was the case .

The WBO would have to follow its own rules , its not a random mandatory bc they just said 180 day as from now .

[uppercut510]

Parker didn't get a percentage , I think some LDBC types or Finkel claimed they knew Parkers flat few devalued the fight and then expressed it as a percentage. The actual amount was never revealed .

"Parker's promoter David Higgins of Duco has confirmed that they've received a contractual offer from Eddie Hearn, who handles Joshua, where the two sides have agreed upon the revenue split for a potential fight in the UK in March or April of 2018.

"We're really, really close," said Higgins. "We've agreed the ratio. The Joshua side gave a small concession, and we've agreed that the Parker side will get somewhere between 30 and 35 percent."

[Ake-Dawg]

It doesnt matter if they named anyone bc they may decide to make a final eliminator .


They wouldn't name Povetkin a mandatory NOW .

Why would they do that if they can get another sanctioning fee ? They would have made Povetkin a mandatory months ago if that was the case .

The WBO would have to follow its own rules , its not a random mandatory bc they just said 180 day as from now .

So you don't think it random for them to say "you must fight this unnamed opponent six months from now". How do you order a champ to fight a mandatory but not know who the mandatory is.

Oh and they get sanctioning fees everytime Joshua fights and the WBO belt is up for grabs so making Povetkin mandatory wouldn't cause them to miss out on a sanctioning fee.

[juggernaut666]

Not the BS again. Come on juggernaut. The contract was rejected because it wasn't sufficient for a fight that will generate the type of revenue this fight is expected to do.

You feel Wilder should just take what he is offered just so you can blame him.

We know why AJ /Hearn swerved Wilder for Povetkin-again you have decided to act like the DAZN situation has nothing to do with Hearn constructing the offer in a way he knew would be rejected. Again, no one can force you to to be honest about what happened.

Deflecting to Usyk has no bearing on this. It's simple- this is yet another barrier Hearn likely created to prevent the AJ/Wilder fight.

The only question is why because most of us think AJ is better and should win.

What was not sufficient ?

What would it generate this year ?

Hw much does Wilder generate ?

What % is 15 Million off FIinkles OWN numbers of a U.K fight ?

How many times has Wilder been on an actual PPV ?

What were the rematch terms ?


What was the rematch going to generate ?


How does the WBO following its own protocal involve Hearn in the slightest way when Hearn himself wouldn't want to be obligated to any mandatory situation ?

Does a Wilder SIGNATURE stop a Povetkin mandatory situation ?

A simple yes or no ?

Did Finkel have a WRITTEN letter or document suggesting the fight would be NEXT ?

Again a SIMPLE yes or No ?


And most importantly .......


WHO AGREED TO AN ACTUAL TEMS OF CONTRACT STIPULATIONS AND RECIEVED THAT CONTRACT ?


O.K i DARE you to answeres ALL these questions and then we can break down any b.s left over and we'll see whos actually grounded to planet earth .!