Comments Thread For: Joshua Ordered By WBO To Make Mandatory After Povetkin

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #41
    Anthony Joshua will now get two of his mandatory challengers out of the way when he faces Alexander Povetkin. The fight, which will be live on talkSPORT on September 22, was originally ordered by t…


    the WBO have told talkSPORT.com that, as Povetkin is #1 in their rankings too, the bout also counts as their mandatory defence.

    “Anthony Joshua is the WBO ‘Super Champion’ in the heavyweight division and will make his mandatory defence when he faces Alexander Povetkin on September 22,” revealed the WBO rep.

    “Joshua has 18 months before he has to make his next mandatory defence.”

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 69418
      • 9,587
      • 7,922
      • 287,568

      #42
      Originally posted by juggernaut666
      A signed contract for unification would stop a mandatory , what are you AGAIN talking about ? lol

      You would think you guys knew this by now with Wilder refusing to put the O.K on the Joshua fight to hault the Povetkin mandatory .

      Whyte will be the number one guy when enforced bc Povetkin is fighting Joshua , Usyk can himself request to fight Joshua whenever he wants but its Hearns fault again right? lol

      Did you miss the part that Wilder CHOSE Fury and it conflicts with April Wembley ?


      You Wilder fanboys gotta get off the Hearn conspiracy ,its dumb as hell . lol
      Not the BS again. Come on juggernaut. The contract was rejected because it wasn't sufficient for a fight that will generate the type of revenue this fight is expected to do.

      You feel Wilder should just take what he is offered just so you can blame him.

      We know why AJ /Hearn swerved Wilder for Povetkin-again you have decided to act like the DAZN situation has nothing to do with Hearn constructing the offer in a way he knew would be rejected. Again, no one can force you to to be honest about what happened.

      Deflecting to Usyk has no bearing on this. It's simple- this is yet another barrier Hearn likely created to prevent the AJ/Wilder fight.

      The only question is why because most of us think AJ is better and should win.

      Comment

      • Boksfan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2017
        • 9185
        • 277
        • 355
        • 66,176

        #43
        Originally posted by The Big Dunn
        WTF??? Wilder shouldn't need to do anything more to earn a fight with AJ.
        You support Wildher avoiding Joshua fight? You are not real boxing fan.

        Comment

        • James Hunt
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2018
          • 3545
          • 788
          • 1,183
          • 34,885

          #44
          AJ vs DW in April 2019 won't be possible anyway bcs of a rematch clause. Cuz no matter who wins (DW or TF), the loser will have a right for a rematch, right?
          So why all the fuss?

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 69418
            • 9,587
            • 7,922
            • 287,568

            #45
            Originally posted by Boksfan
            You support Wildher avoiding Joshua fight? You are not real boxing fan.
            WTF? Your posts are getting progressively worse.

            I am upset Hearn/AJ are not fighting Wilder now and I am upset this appears to be orchestrated by Hearn to provide an excuse should he and AJ decide to swerve him again.

            Comment

            • Boksfan
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2017
              • 9185
              • 277
              • 355
              • 66,176

              #46
              Originally posted by BreakingBox
              I'm sure Wilder will have a very nice payday against Fury.
              Sure he will but I'm sure he's looking ahead.

              Comment

              • James Hunt
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2018
                • 3545
                • 788
                • 1,183
                • 34,885

                #47
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                I think you should've thought more before you posted this reply. Why would the WBC champ need to fight a WBO eliminator?
                It's a joke.

                Comment

                • CocoonOfHorror
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2018
                  • 181
                  • 7
                  • 41
                  • 12,082

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Accolade
                  Pulev vs Hughie Fury will decide the IBF mandatory, and that's happening October 27th. My guess is that the mandatory will be due by the end of 2019/early 2020.

                  There won't be an undisputed champion until 2020 at the earliest, and I'm not even considering the ****ty deals they'll offer Wilder/Fury to delay the fights even further. Sorry folks!
                  Sad but true. Damn, this is disappointing.
                  At this point, assuming he beats Fury and they don't rematch, Wilder could increase his expected value on career earnings by fighting AJ for $0 in April. Assuming it's a 50/50 and Wilder makes say $40M for the rematch if he wins. Expected value for 2019 is $20M, which probably exceeds what he could make fighting three times vs. Breazeale, Ortiz 2 (?) and maybe Chisora (?).

                  And the IBF uses the baseline standard of 90 days between fights for the mandatory. They may not enforce strictly, but theoretically AJ would have to fight the winner by July 2019 which is ridiculous especially following a tough fight.

                  Comment

                  • The Big Dunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 69418
                    • 9,587
                    • 7,922
                    • 287,568

                    #49
                    Originally posted by James Hunt
                    It's a joke.
                    Not from that poster it wasn't. He was being serious.

                    Comment

                    • BreakingBox
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • May 2017
                      • 169
                      • 28
                      • 54
                      • 6,857

                      #50
                      Originally posted by James Hunt
                      That's also true.
                      Deyonce is the only one with the power to change this.
                      Will he??
                      They can send all of the contracts they want, but Wilder isn't signing anything until a fair contract is sent over. Wilder has moved on from Joshua. I watched one of Hearn's recent interviews concerning the Wilder/Fury fight, and Hearn thinks that Wilder is probably getting 15 million and Fury is getting maybe 10 million. Hearn also said that Fury would probably get 20 million if he fought Joshua. Hearn also admitted that the Joshua/Wilder fight would be bigger than Joshua/Fury. So, do you still think a 15 million flat fee offer to Wilder is fair?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP