Well, it's not my fault that AJ is the face of the division. I didn't put him in that position, he fought his way up there which wilder couldn't do with twice the fight AJ has.
Wilder/fury can't sell their fight without talking down on AJ.
That is how important he is to them to sell the fight.
Certainly it's not your fault AJ is the farce of the HW division. What is your fault is your failure to understand that Wilder makes AJ v Wilder bigger than AJ v (anyone else)
That ranking system you are using also has NO one Wilder defended his title against in the top 10 WHEN Wilder fought them .
Logical fallacy.
If we're going by TBRB, which I'm fine with, the alphabelts are irrelevant.
So you worded things the way you did to try to disqualify Bermane Stiverne, who was #3 in the world when Wilder dominated him.
Neither Wilder nor AJ have ever been champion according to TBRB, so it makes no sense to creatively phrase your statement to try to pretend Stiverne wasn't a highly rated win.
The bottom line is with a 55-45 split, BOTH fighters will make more than they ever had before. Its really not that difficult. The fight cant happen without each other and most people are losing site of this.
this is fraud on the guy that is bringing more.
Each guy should earn according to what they can generate.
No way in this life wilder gets 45%.
Certainly it's not your fault AJ is the farce of the HW division. What is your fault is your failure to understand that Wilder makes AJ v Wilder bigger than AJ v (anyone else)
That should be simple to understand
That's why the contract is there to be signed not targeting an unfit fury for a final eliminator.
The bottom line is with a 55-45 split, BOTH fighters will make more than they ever had before. Its really not that difficult. The fight cant happen without each other and most people are losing site of this.
yeah but one guy makes 10x what he's ever made, and the other barely doubles.
yeah but one guy makes 10x what he's ever made, and the other barely doubles.
That's not fair is it?
They are 1 and 2 in the world, i hate the argument of how much money boxers made in previous fights... why should how much money u make in past fights be indicitive of future fights?! Both fighters will make a sht ton of money, both fighters will make more than they ever had.. A 55-45 is totally fair.
They are 1 and 2 in the world, i hate the argument of how much money boxers made in previous fights... why should how much money u make in past fights be indicitive of future fights?! Both fighters will make a sht ton of money, both fighters will make more than they ever had.. A 55-45 is totally fair.
umm.. because it's literally the only evidence of the worth of each fighter?
One is a tremendous star who brings in nearly all the revenue and the other is a belt holder who is not a star, but just a decent draw.
Comment