Now why would a sanctioning body state that a particular fight "seems" to be next? Is that supposed to make people believe that the claims are real?
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: It Seems That Wilder Will Fight Tyson Fury Next
Collapse
-
Why are you whinging about it? The sanctioning body has to be notified if Wilder is taking this fight, as they must SANCTION it. It also stands to reason that they care about the actions of their champions.Comment
-
I meant mando sorry about that chiefThe fuck is a "mondo?" WBC promised Whyte a guaranteed shot at Wilder if he beat Ortiz, and Wilder gave Whyte his word. Whyte refused to fight Ortiz despite calling him an old man. If by a very slim chance Whyte beat Ortiz and Wilder didn't fight him, he would've devalued Wilder's best win and proved that Wilder doesn't keep his word, which would actually give weight to the claim that Wilder is ducking. He also could've gotten Wilder stripped in the long run. Instead of doing that, he chose to fight Joseph Parker, and now he's looking to fight Charr, a glorified bum.
Serves me right to get the rest of your s**ty post aimed this way . You first said a guaranteed shot ? But in how many fights helmet
Wilders has had to go to rehab to find his next OpponentComment
-
Fuck is "whinging"?
If Sulaiman has an announcement to make, it should be that the fight is scheduled to take place on such and such date, at such and such venue. Not that it "seems" that the fight will be next.
Comment
-
You're a moron. Just stop posting please.Comment
-
I like to speak in the language of my audience and I thought you were a UK fan considering how ****** your post was. My apologies for the mischaracterization; let's call it "whining" instead. Again, why are you whining about the WBC president being welcome to the fight and taking note of the direction of one of his organization's champions? Sky Sports reached out to Sulaiman for an interview, Sulaiman responded. There's nothing to cry about, and he isn't obligated to speak in absolutes.Comment
-
-
Whyte was the original 2nd Mandatory bc he had elimination bouts so then they threw in Ortiz off a loss as FINAL eliminator in which either winner gets a 2 year wait ? lol
Everything else he said is correct yet refuses to enforce THAT Breazeale mandatory so you wont see that fight too bc Fury will probably defeat Wilder then fight undisputed with Joshua in April .Comment
-
Whyte was never the second mandatory. Had he fought Ortiz, he would've earned that right, but he didn't.Whyte was the original 2nd Mandatory bc he had elimination bouts so then they threw in Ortiz off a loss as FINAL eliminator in which either winner gets a 2 year wait ? lol
Everything else he said is correct yet refuses to enforce THAT Breazeale mandatory so you wont see that fight too bc Fury will probably defeat Wilder then fight undisputed with Joshua in April .
10k useless posts from an absolute dimwit
Comment
Comment