Pac-Man is an embarrassing accident waiting to happen.
Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Should Think Carefully About Next Opponent
Collapse
-
-
-
-
I feel like pac is still being written off just because of the bogus horn decision.
Who cares if matthyse was shot pac would beat matthyse prime or not. Even though i still want pac to retire he still has the ability to box the hell out of anyone not named spence,crawford and thurman.Comment
-
So much wrong in this article.
PAC beats Porter, Danny, Broner, Khan easily.
While this I agree, PAC is the underdog against Terence, Spence, but will be competitive win or lose with these two.
While Thurman, Jack rabbit style, that lacks fundamentals, and winds his punches a lot, won’t work with a patient methodical shark that is Pacquiao now. PAC will dissect Thurman easily.Comment
-
Thurman is probably coming back vs a tomato can but he beats Pacquiao "easily". OK. The best thing about this article is that it didn't mention Lomachenko who is too small for 140 atm.Comment
-
"Errol Spence, Terence Crawford and Keith Thurman. No, no and no."
I agree 100%!
"And I don’t have to stop at Spence, Crawford and Thurman. I don’t think Pacquiao would beat Danny Garcia or Shawn Porter, either, although I’d give the old man a chance to win those fights."
I'm not so sure about this one! I think Porter is too strong for Pacquiao right now! I think DSG is a 60/40 fight (Garcia), only due to Pac's age!
Manny's Best Options:
1. Adrien Broner @ 144-147 $$$$$
2. Amir Khan @ 147 $$$$$
3. Vasyl Lomachenko @ 140
4. Jose Ramirez @ 140
5. Danny Garcia @ 147Last edited by Bronx2245; 07-21-2018, 06:39 AM.Comment
-
The only 2 in that list I can't see Pac beating at this time is Crawford and Spence only because of their size advantage. Possibly Porter, due to his aggressive style(very similar to Horn). None of the name mentioned beats pac "easily ". Who has ever beaten pac easily without going through hell. Pac ain't the same without a doubt, but is definitely still a force in the division.Comment
-
It's becoming a little silly now. Pac should stay away from these guys cause he's 39 ? when all these guys are pushing 30 themselves...
Hard for me to really believe Pac doesn't give any of the top 5 a hard time If he can give Floyd problems
All this he's so far past his prime and doesn't have the blistering speed he once has is BS too he may not throw as many punches but there's no difference in Pacman speed still 1 of if not the fastest hands in boxing.
Pac looked just as good as he did against Cotto at age 31 imo u could say Cotto wasn't at his best much like Matthyese because he came down to 145..
But I mean they act as if Pac was some invisible force in his early 30's I don't see Pac having any better chance at beating the top 5 whether he's 31 or 39 but he might even have a better chance now because he's a lot more patient and a better counter puncher now when before it was just volume punching ftmp
Whats irks me is if you look at Crawford vs Horn and Pac vs Horn Pac had horn just as hurt maybe even more by that ruling Pac should have a stoppage win against Horn too..Last edited by Realizniguhnit; 07-21-2018, 06:49 AM.Comment
Comment