Which would you subscribe to DAZN or ESPN+?

[Curt Henning]

Espn has more content but all that **** used to be free on ESPN on demand or 360 whatever they used to call it

this

if i had to id go espn+ all day...because of that and at least crawford, pac and loma

but i refuse to get espn+ on principle...i have plenty of expenses and dont need to pay for something that used to be free with my cable subscription

[BigZ44]

I already have ESPN+ and will be signing up for the free trial of DAZN to see if I want to become a fulltime subscriber. ATM, ESPN+ definitely has the wider range of sports option and also the better fights/fighters. I suspect the DAZN side will only improve and having the WBSS is a big coup. In the end I'll probably end up with both.

I really hope DAZN have some kinds of fight shows as well. Pre-fight breakdowns, post fight analysis, schedule look-aheads, boxing gossip and talk show type stuff. That would really increase the chances of me becoming a subscriber. ESPN+ does a little of this with Rafael's show, which isn't all that good and the other show which I really like (name is slipping my mind right now.)

[pillowfists98]

From a boxing fans perspective DAZN is superior. They have more boxing content and only half the top rank cards are on ESPN+ anyway. I guess if you like other sports like MLS soccer or rugby then it would be worth it though. I plan on subscribing to DAZN but not to ESPN+.

[Zaryu]

I already have espn+, let's see what DAZN brings to the table

[filup79]

DAZN has been announced at $9.99 a month.

ESPN+ is $5 a month.

Which would you subscribe to out of the two and which one is a better deal?

Neither... Both are services that I would only use once or twice a month for a good fight and that's it. I would only subscribe to a service that I will be using at least daily. Did the ESPN+ for the trial and just watched a fight and never used it again.

[sicko]

Neither of them.

Neither! Only because it is BETTER Alternatives

[champion4ever]

I wouldn't subscribe to neither unless there is a good fight on that pique my interest.

[champion4ever]

Neither... Both are services that I would only use once or twice a month for a good fight and that's it. I would only subscribe to a service that I will be using at least daily. Did the ESPN+ for the trial and just watched a fight and never used it again.

Exactly the point! I'm with you on that assessment. They are charging too much money for these online streaming services especially if you are subscribed to cable television too.

[FinitoxDinamita]

Neither. What am I, a sucker? Lol this isnt about money but it’s about me refusing to get ass****d with no vaseline.

[MASTERBX]

ESPN+ i don't like Snooker nor darts!