Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: From Round 1, I Knew He Couldn't Handle My Power!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WesternChamp
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 14561
    • 239
    • 73
    • 20,277

    #21
    Originally posted by BufordTannen
    Nice deflection. Doesn’t change anything about my post. Rios and algieri never fought at welterweight either.
    rios and algieri has never quit before either.

    Comment

    • Bobby Shaw
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 4308
      • 236
      • 29
      • 39,810

      #22
      I will take him seriouly when VADA gets involved

      Comment

      • WesternChamp
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 14561
        • 239
        • 73
        • 20,277

        #23

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #24
          Prime Pac would have ended this in round 1, too. It was embarrassing how much better he was than Matthysse.

          Comment

          • Dramacyde
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2016
            • 1442
            • 66
            • 0
            • 21,771

            #25
            Where was all that "Power" the last 9 years?

            Comment

            • Beercules
              Lounge POTY '17
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2013
              • 65186
              • 4,940
              • 7,203
              • 950,179

              #26
              Originally posted by BufordTannen
              Imagine that. Pacquiao at 40 years old stronger than he was 5 years ago while fighting in a shlt hole country. Nothing su****ious about that at all.
              Originally posted by revelated
              Fixed that for you.
              Eh. I dont see the issue.

              Comment

              • RuleOfTheSpear
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2018
                • 3553
                • 492
                • 310
                • 53,043

                #27
                Originally posted by Dramacyde
                Where was all that "Power" the last 9 years?

                Welterweight is not Pac's weight. He's a natural 140. Same with Matthyse. They're more or less the same height. Pac fought way bigger men for the last 9 years. Margarito was ultimately the limit. Name one fighter he fought that was smaller than him. He fought bigger dudes that rehydrates to 150-

                That flyweight power ain't knocking out any 150-160 pounders

                Comment

                • WesternChamp
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 14561
                  • 239
                  • 73
                  • 20,277

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dramacyde
                  Where was all that "Power" the last 9 years?
                  what power?? lucas quit. pac fought basically the same way he did in the 3rd bradley fight.

                  Comment

                  • abracada
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 5533
                    • 381
                    • 674
                    • 168,610

                    #29
                    Originally posted by trainhard_187
                    Exactly what it was.... Lucas was old, slower, and the perfect size and style for Pacman... Just that simple..
                    Styles make fight

                    Comment

                    • Combat Talk Radio
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2015
                      • 21727
                      • 2,781
                      • 6,368
                      • 83,247

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Beercules
                      Eh. I dont see the issue.
                      Why imply when you can explicitly call it out for what it is?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP