Fury isn't king of anything he just calls himself a king. I think he is a one hit wonder who beat a very old Wlad when Wlad fought a poor sup par fight. Fury didn't look very king like when little old Cunningham dropped him for a 7 count. There have been other fights in which he also didn't look very good if you study his whole record and not just a few of his better fights. He looked like fat garbage in his cherry pick comeback fight. My numbers for Fury aren't as good as yours. I give him only a 10% chance o ever beating AJ or Wilder.
Fury's chances a mathematical approach
Collapse
-
BS. You are living in a Fury fantasy land. His very short time as the world's heavyweight champion is over for good. Haven't you noticed nobody is afraid of him anymore? Everyone is calling him out wanting to share a ring with him. He has become a low risk high reward fight. Is he going to fight a legit top 10 heavyweight next or another cherrypick cruiserweight nobody ever heard of again.Comment
-
Fury would bodybag at least 1/2 of the top 10 heavyweights in his current condition. Do you honestly see a plodder like Parker standing a chance?BS. You are living in a Fury fantasy land. His very short time as the world's heavyweight champion is over for good. Haven't you noticed nobody is afraid of him anymore? Everyone is calling him out wanting to share a ring with him. He has become a low risk high reward fight. Is he going to fight a legit top 10 heavyweight next or another cherrypick cruiserweight nobody ever heard of again.Comment
-
Bravo, sir... and it actually all made substantial sense, not just grammatically but according to the dictates of logic too, whilst simultaneously showing a deft humourous touch. I think you may even have surpassed me at my eye-wateringly verbose best... found my eyes automatically racing ahead looking for somewhere I might pause for breath on the final paragraph.OK, I'm game.
a) Kudos for the attempt to roll with Bayesian-style analysis on NSB.
b) Whence does this beautiful ******* of percentages derive, and whence in particular their provenance?
c) Even then, the last line of analysis pertains to certain concomitant, esoteric and innumerate variables that could be said to have an level of absolute and perhaps even supererogatory influence upon the matter at hand; specifically the level at which the paradigm that holds for the majority of the overall system decoheres (at what might be called the 'Planck distance' of boxing') into a different paradigm due to the increased weight of certain variables. Moreover, the influence of this statistically minute subset of the overall system nonetheless has an incommensurate effect on the shape and emergence of the system as a whole.
TLDR; even if these numbers are true the king ain't back, because his inability to beat the 1% matters more than him beating the 99%, because OP's dazzling numbers don't map the influence of $$$ held by the 1%. QED.
Kudos.
Comment
A 100% prime Tyson Fury can’t be beat by the current crop of HWs. The only person who May cause trouble is AJ, but AJ is a bit suspect still, his chin hasn’t been tested nor his endurance if pushed over 12 full rounds.Comment
All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 01:09 AM.
Comment