Have there been a case where the B side turned down a lucrative offer...

[HURTFEELINGS]

AJ decided against fighting Wilder making 50 million (Hearn confirmed it), to fight Povetkin.......*check out other screen names recent posts (concerning GGG, accepting flat fees) you'll get a laugh, when you read their new positions)
And AJ is only a draw on that little island, we saw his numbers on his Parker fight Then check out Wilder's #'s and compare

[GhostofDempsey]

Maybe Khan because of religious holidays, but that's it. Can't think of any other fighter who turned down career high paydays using the date as the excuse.

[rickJen]

Doe, Wilder and team were holding a contract for weeks.
No matter how you slice and dice it, Wilder had complete control whether the fight happens or not.
Look at the title. What's the answer?
First time a B side turned down a shot at 4 belts plus $15 mil,
because of a ****** date which could have been easily sorted out in minutes!
Instead, he just let the contract rot for weeks.
This guy wanted none of the fight.

[rickJen]

AJ decided against fighting Wilder making 50 million (Hearn confirmed it), to fight Povetkin.......*check out other screen names recent posts (concerning GGG, accepting flat fees) you'll get a laugh, when you read their new positions)
And AJ is only a draw on that little island, we saw his numbers on his Parker fight Then check out Wilder's #'s and compare

Yeah I remember clearly you were insulting Pacquaio and GGG
for not accepting the flat fee offer.
Now you're going crazy against Wilder accepting it.
It's distasteful.

[MUNG]

i thought he turned down 15 mil because he didnt get a rematch clause, but realistically b sides dont get rematch clauses, i think him and his team are just butt sore after their mission impossible offer disintegrated after 24 hrs

if a rematch clause for wilder is going to be a deal breaker then hearn will just go on milking joshua, mooooo

[rickJen]

i thought he turned down 15 mil because he didnt get a rematch clause, but realistically b sides dont get rematch clauses, i think him and his team are just butt sore after their mission impossible offer disintegrated after 24 hrs

if a rematch clause for wilder is going to be a deal breaker then hearn will just go on milking joshua, mooooo

I don't even get the rematch crap when he's been saying he will surely beat Joshua.
It's also the first time a B side demanded a rematch clause.
This guy needs a good negotiator.

[OctoberRed]

Mora turning down $1 million for Jermain Taylor, because he didnt like the location

[HURTFEELINGS]

Yeah I remember clearly you were insulting Pacquaio and GGG
for not accepting the flat fee offer.
Now you're going crazy against Wilder accepting it.
It's distasteful.

Pac fight was 2015, GGG fight was 2017, according to your info it says you werent on this site during this time.............So what was your alt name? LMAO....This way we can check the validity of your argument......

[rickJen]

Pac fight was 2015, GGG fight was 2017, according to your info it says you werent on this site during this time.............So what was your alt name? LMAO....This way we can check the validity of your argument......

I was here lurking weeks, months leading the Cnelo/GGG fight.
You don't have to check doe. I'll just tell you straight out.
I didn't have any comment. $20 mil is too big to be believed.
It's never been confirmed. It was fake and you clowns fell for it and now eating crow for going against it when your idol is on the line.

[QueensburyRules]

[MENTION]l[/MENTION]

...not to mention a shot at multiple titles because of the date?

--- Fat Lar who was still skinny was the A side turning down a record $8 mil purse and title unification in SAfrica against Gerrie Coetzee...only in boxing during fat Lars single belt reign...