correct, wilder isn't the attraction pac was which is why we're talking about significantly less money. The flat fee pac was offered was 40 mil and he made about 3 times as much. This is more similar to the Canelo vs ggg situation but what all 3 have in common, is that despite being the b side, they all will be the biggest grossing fight that the A side had or in this case has available to them. Wilder doesn't deserve the lions share but he does deserve a percentage of what the ppv generates.
Comments Thread For: Lennox Lewis: Wilder Deserves 60-40 Split for Joshua Fight
Collapse
-
-
That's arguably true, but the pompous Brits also have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and a false sense of superiority. As neither an American nor Brit, it's easy to see that they are both similarly arrogant. I anticipate that my assessment will upset some uptight Brits and Americans, so feel free to reply (retaliate) with your favorite insults about Canada. We're usually down-to-earth enough to brush-off insults from the mentally ill.
Joshua is the A-side, Wilder is the B-side,
but that's a cliche way of looking at the situation, and it's counter-productive for negotiating the fight. The A-side B-side reference comes from the antiquated record industry, and right now both sides are sounding like a broken record.
And the UK vs. US thing doesn't phase me. After all, the best Brits left the old world and made this one. How can it not possibly be better?Brits are just jealous.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Fury dethroned a long time champ but it was a disaster? You do know there have been many boring fights in history but the result still stands as a great accomplishment?
Fury wasn't/isn't a bum, nor was he overweight for the Wlad fight.
You really do come out with some crap, do you know that?
Oh, and have you given that other thread a swerve after I proved you wrong?Comment
-
You're giving Fury a lot of credit for timidly doing just enough to get a victory in what turned-out to be among the worst fights in heavyweight title history. There was a time when you actually had to BEAT the champ to take his title. Fury tiptoed away with it like a burglar in the night. He did, however, make the fight look easy in comparison to Anthony Joshua's herculean effort against Klitschko.
Fury does deserve a lot of credit for beating the guy who had held the title for 10 years. It's not something you sniff at.Comment
-
Comment
-
Sorry Charlie but verbal contract isn’t going to work. Face reality everyone including top HWs former and current are calling out a duck job. Just face it your champ is as yellow as they come. It’ll be ok, I promise.Comment
-
Comment
-
If Eddie Hearn had any real intention of negotiation a Joshua-Wilder fight
he would not have begun by intentionally mispronouncing Shelly Finkel's name in interviews & social media posts. That was completely obnoxious, immature, and counter-productive to negotiations. It shows how seriously Hearn took the situation, and more importantly, what kind of person he is.
Calling Shelly "Shirly" doesn't paint a picture of not wanting to negotiate the fight in good faith, but it does show disrespect and immaturity.Comment
-
Not saying that you are included in this assessment, but I find Canadians really pretty dumb on average based on dealing with them every day for my job. Sometimes they make me want to tear my hair out understanding the most basic of things. But, in a way that's a good thing because they seem more laid back.
And the UK vs. US thing doesn't phase me. After all, the best Brits left the old world and made this one. How can it not possibly be better?Brits are just jealous.
And for an American to call anyone from another country "Dumb" shows that you really haven't grasped the meaning of irony.Comment
Comment