Point your missing is that Parker wasn't seen as a real threat, so Hearn was willing to go as high as 33% as low risk. Wilder is high risk, so Hearn won't necessarily go higher than for Parker in percentage terms. Its not like Canelo/Golovkin where neither of them had any big money alternatives, Joshua can soldier on making big money without Wilder, specifically without having to take the risk of losing to him.
Hearn knows this and would only go into a Wilder fight if Joshua's cut had enough 'insurance premium' there to make up for lost opportunities if Joshua lost, I'd be surprised if Hearn shifted to a percentage, but if he did, I'm betting he would be looking at around 80% for Joshua, far from anything Wilder would accept. Fight won't happen.
Hearn knows this and would only go into a Wilder fight if Joshua's cut had enough 'insurance premium' there to make up for lost opportunities if Joshua lost, I'd be surprised if Hearn shifted to a percentage, but if he did, I'm betting he would be looking at around 80% for Joshua, far from anything Wilder would accept. Fight won't happen.
Comment