Hearn: The offer is still on the table
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
So how can you act like the contract was for the fight to take place next?!? Finkel kept trying to get an answer on whether the fight would be next and when he finally got an answer, Eddie said no, not next, April.Comment
-
As I said one side is lying
I’m convinced it’s shirley and team wilder but we will never know until emails etc are produced
Not selective documentsComment
-
Even Eddie himself just said it's valid to sign... for a FIGHT IN APRIL AFTER THE POVETKIN FIGHT TAKES PLACE.
So how can you act like the contract was for the fight to take place next?!? Finkel kept trying to get an answer on whether the fight would be next and when he finally got an answer, Eddie said no, not next, April.
Hearn confirmed it was next during the stalling by Shirley
Shirley then went on espn and said he will return it on Friday with comments so the wba saw it and called povetkin fight as there was more stalling
Now after that Hearn has said the fight is off as we have to fight povetkin but we. CAn fight in April
You are lying on purposeComment
-
Even Eddie himself just said it's valid to sign... for a FIGHT IN APRIL AFTER THE POVETKIN FIGHT TAKES PLACE.
So how can you act like the contract was for the fight to take place next?!? Finkel kept trying to get an answer on whether the fight would be next and when he finally got an answer, Eddie said no, not next, April.
They had a contract for nearly two weeks. Didn't sign and didn't come back with anything.Comment
-
According to who? Shelly said Hearn told him April.
And now Hearn is publicly saying April.
When Wilder offered 50 million, the term sheet made it very clear the time frame for the fight and that it would be next, no interim fights.
Even if Hearn didn't know the exact date, if he intended for the fight to be next, the offer would have stated the time frame and that it would be next, no interim fights.Comment
Comment