Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBA Gives Joshua 24 Hours to Close Deal for Povetkin Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by khal-d View Post
    That's what you think. You might be right, but it's what you THINK.

    What I do know, is that the WBA, not Hearn, took concrete steps to derail Joshua-Wilder.

    The WBA forced the issue here, not even by enforcing their own rules (Super champions not forced to fight mandatories, that's for the Regular title holder).
    Come on man...read between the lines. Hearn has been throwing this WBA-Povetkin thing out there since a Wilder fight was mentioned. He never once questioned why his WBA Super Champion was being forced to fight a mandatory, when a guy like Keith Thurman hasn't fought in a year-and-a-half, and is still holding on to his Super title.

    You can give Hearn a pass if you want, but this is obviously his doing.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
      If Haymon is gonna order the WBC to screw Whyte, then Hearn can order the WBA to screw Wilder.

      Politics baby
      True. At least we agree Hearn is behind this. They're running from an ass whooping.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by 5000boxing View Post
        Lmao!!! That's what I'm saying.. and the wba gave a 24 hour deadline?? Wtf kinda magical ****ery is this?
        I don't think they can strip Anthony Joshua, and even if the WBA did I remember when Anthony was talking about vacating the IBF instead of facing Kubrat Pulev in order to honor a rematch clause vs. Klitschko -- sounds dignified HOWEVER they knew that the IBF would threaten to strip Joshua BEFORE they signed a back to back fight with old Wladimir and had other mandatories in line.

        So I say all that to say this : This fight with Deontay Wilder brings in MORE MONEY than a fight with old washed Klitshcko and is for the UNDISPUTED HW title but for some reason Hearns and Mismatchroom do not treat it with the same regard...I wonder why?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by FLY TY View Post
          Come on man...read between the lines. Hearn has been throwing this WBA-Povetkin thing out there since a Wilder fight was mentioned. He never once questioned why his WBA Super Champion was being forced to fight a mandatory, when a guy like Keith Thurman hasn't fought in a year-and-a-half, and is still holding on to his Super title.

          You can give Hearn a pass if you want, but this is obviously his doing.
          Wrong.. the WBA committee president may determine factors including the length between mandatory title defences for a super champion.

          Comment


          • #25
            Unification trumps mandatories.... doe

            Comment


            • #26
              So obvious. Wilders team knew this was coming, they probly lobbied wba for it as a get out clause. Wait for bumsquad to claim he is being ducked in next 24hrs. ****ing ridiculous.
              Fight itself will be ok for 5 rounds then aj sparks pedvetkin.

              Comment


              • #27
                Wilder vs Joshua was never going to happen next. Hearn all but said he wanted Joshua to fight Povetkin in the fall because Wembley wasn't available until early 2019 which is where he wants to stage the Wilder bout. Also, since someone mentioned it, Wilder hasn't signed anything. His team just said they returned the contract with a couple of modifications. I fully expect Hearn to do what he did with Klitschko; set the Povetkin fight then formally announce the bout once Joshua beats Povtekin, which I expect he will.

                Comment


                • #28
                  If Joshua loses to Povetkin, his stock will plummet and the Wilder fight will lose a lot of interest. Which means Wilder stands to lose a lot of money if Joshua loses to Povetkin. He can kiss that $15M+ payday goodbye, go back to his $2M purses to fight no-hopers.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
                    I don't think they can strip Anthony Joshua, and even if the WBA did I remember when Anthony was talking about vacating the IBF instead of facing Kubrat Pulev in order to honor a rematch clause vs. Klitschko -- sounds dignified HOWEVER they knew that the IBF would threaten to strip Joshua BEFORE they signed a back to back fight with old Wladimir and had other mandatories in line.

                    So I say all that to say this : This fight with Deontay Wilder brings in MORE MONEY than a fight with old washed Klitshcko and is for the UNDISPUTED HW title but for some reason Hearns and Mismatchroom do not treat it with the same regard...I wonder why?
                    Ha!.. you know why!!! Doomsday Wilder will make Superman AJ **** on himself in front of 90,000!! Can you imagine 90,000 fans looking at their superhero leaving the ring like Spilka?? Lol

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      This actually plays into Haymon’s plan. They know that win or lose if AJ fights Pov, he’s going to get busted up. If Pov wins, Haymon will offer the same $50 million to Pov to come to the US. If AJ wins, he will take the $50 million to come to the US. There are 2 promoters that Hearn can’t outbid:
                      Ryabinsky & Haymon
                      This fight will take place in Russia if it happens

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP