Why isn’t it a 50/50 split??? Pulev ain’t champ. The IBF is doing themselves no favors with this.
Simple one has worked and paid his dues to be in the top two and beat other top ranked fighters the other is a fat lazy pig who likes eating more than earning a top 2 ranking.
Simple one has worked and paid his dues to be in the top two and beat other top ranked fighters the other is a fat lazy pig who likes eating more than earning a top 2 ranking.
I’d be inclined to agree although he’s earned a mandatory, Miller has not.
Washington, Wach and Duhaupas isn't the worst string of wins. Probably better than quite a few heavies at the moment. That's better than Pulev has done in recent times as well.
Washington, Wach and Duhaupas isn't the worst string of wins. Probably better than quite a few heavies at the moment. That's better than Pulev has done in recent times as well.
Right but all the while Pulev has been sat above him whilst Washington and Wach are fat removed from the top twenty. Chisora was an actual semi eliminator if memory serves before Whyte and Chisora went life and death with each other thus lowering Chisora’s standing yet further.
Again I’m inclined to agree that Duhauaps is a top competitor and believe the like of Wilder should be credited more for a fighter I considered top ten at the time he fought him. Pulev however is better schooled than all these guys and has more proven pedigree.
I found it laughable that Miller is deemed a better fighter/boxer than Pulev, all I put that down to is a sad pathetic racial bias.
Right but all the while Pulev has been sat above him whilst Washington and Wach are fat removed from the top twenty. Chisora was an actual semi eliminator if memory serves before Whyte and Chisora went life and death with each other thus lowering Chisora’s standing yet further.
Again I’m inclined to agree that Duhauaps is a top competitor and believe the like of Wilder should be credited more for a fighter I considered top ten at the time he fought him. Pulev however is better schooled than all these guys and has more proven pedigree.
I found it laughable that Miller is deemed a better fighter/boxer than Pulev, all I put that down to is a sad pathetic racial bias.
I agree Pulev is better schooled. I lean towards Miller in that fight because of activity and age. I wanna see what Pulev would do when he can't control the distance in that fight or how he'd deal with Miller's volume and pressure. It's a far more intriguing fight to me than Whyte vs Parker, that's for sure.
I agree Pulev is better schooled. I lean towards Miller in that fight because of activity and age. I wanna see what Pulev would do when he can't control the distance in that fight or how he'd deal with Miller's volume and pressure. It's a far more intriguing fight to me than Whyte vs Parker, that's for sure.
Whyte vs Parker is a good fight. I was looking forward to Pulev against Whyte so I could humour myself afterwards in regards to Pulev’s critics. Again Pulev vs Miller is another good fight though I expect Miller won’t fancy the hard work.
You put any of these guys in with each other you’ve a solid fight. Personally I hold Pulev is higher esteem than all four followed by Parker, Miller and then lastly Whyte whom I really do not rate at all that highly the dude went life and death with Chisora ffs !
I’m neither here nor there in regards to Miller, he’s another Andy Ruiz imo, an unconditioned slob whom isn’t all that bad but lack a certain amount of discipline.
Comment