Tweet
theres very few potential match ups if at all these days that fit that criteria. seems as if every world level fight is deemed to be some huge event that needs years to build up, promoters have pulled the wool other peoples eyes good and proper, and now weve got the drones on here reciting their bull****.
spence and crawford have 1 win between them, thats not a super fight. And before people start shouting and swearing, thats the truth of it whatever way you dice it. However good you think they are in the eye test, thats the type of fight they need to be taking now to prove themselves. Not wasting years of their prime building it.
Even joshua v wilder isnt really that huge a fight in the scheme of things, . you arent talking mayweather v de la hoya here. these are guys who at most have 1 good win against ageing opposition.
Theres barely any fighters these days with a strong enough resume to warrant any of their fights being considered a superfight, its a weak era and a lot of those fighters on the current p4p list wouldnt be near the top in a different era based on their resume. And yes im including fighters like golovkin in that assessment.
spence and crawford have 1 win between them, thats not a super fight. And before people start shouting and swearing, thats the truth of it whatever way you dice it. However good you think they are in the eye test, thats the type of fight they need to be taking now to prove themselves. Not wasting years of their prime building it.
Even joshua v wilder isnt really that huge a fight in the scheme of things, . you arent talking mayweather v de la hoya here. these are guys who at most have 1 good win against ageing opposition.
Theres barely any fighters these days with a strong enough resume to warrant any of their fights being considered a superfight, its a weak era and a lot of those fighters on the current p4p list wouldnt be near the top in a different era based on their resume. And yes im including fighters like golovkin in that assessment.
Comment