How would you honestly rate Golovkin?
Collapse
-
-
Supposedly he refers to him as lil G so it is clear he isn't talking about George Groves or George Foreman. LOL! But whatever.I have no idea what you two are arguing about, but regarding this post, yeah, absolutely. If you don't the mental aptitude to respect all boxers whether you like them or not, you don't deserve to be heard. Period.
Whether you use 'lil G', 'coWard', 'Fraud', 'Kkkovalev', you're half a step away from the ignore list.Comment
-
uh.. no they're not different. They're all lame insults used by ****ty posters. If you can't be bothered to type out a fighter's name, you don't deserve to talk about them.Comment
-
Well if that is the case then you are an anomaly. It is pretty common knowledge where liltle g or lil G stems from.
The only thing being made up is you saying I'm making things up. You keep saying I say things which I don't.Comment
-
if calling someone lil G is the same as labelling someone a member of the KKK, then I dont want you replyin to me, your values are screwed up very badly.
Kovalev gets called Krusher a lot but if you think thats the same as being called a member of the KKK, kudos to your lack of the language. its just a nick, and surely a benevolent one at that.Last edited by DreamFighter; 06-26-2018, 11:26 AM.Comment
-
List the fighters in his weight class that could have beaten him in his prime?Comment
-
then prove you havent made up that Ward calls GGG lil G, quote please. or lese you have made it up.Comment
-
Not the same but it is used disparagingly by the Golovkin hater crowd. You say you are completely unaware of that which is pretty surprising by someone who posts on these forums. But you do sound like a casual fan often so I guess it is a possibility.
I did notice you didn't respond to the part below. Is it fair to say if Pac decided to fight Golovkin that in your opinion that would be a tougher fighter for Golovkin than Charlo based on the fact that Pac is a multi-division champion?
My previous post:
You think Cotto was a tougher fight for Martinez in 2014 than Golovkin. People in boxing knew who Golovkin was by 2012. Just like they know who Charlo is today (and Golovkin was far more established than Charlo is today). If Manny Pacquaio decided to jump up to fight Golovkin today people in boxing would know that Charlo is a more dangerous opponent than Pac. Casuals (and the more you write the more you sound like one) would say "Charlo who?", Pac is more dangerous than that guy. He has so many titles in so many weight divisions. The same argument you are making with Cotto.Comment
-
thats obvious, pac has no title today, Golovkin is unified champ.Not the same but it is used disparagingly by the Golovkin hater crowd. You say you are completely unaware of that which is pretty surprising by someone who posts on these forums. But you do sound like a casual fan often so I guess it is a possibility.
I did notice you didn't respond to the part below. Is it fair to say if Pac decided to fight Golovkin that in your opinion that would be a tougher fighter for Golovkin than Charlo based on the fact that Pac is a multi-division champion?
There is no similarity between the two cases,if anything they prove I am right. your question and the answer supports me, not you.Comment
-
How about we bet accounts? I find the quote and prove it you shut down for a week. I don't in the next 5 minutes and I'll log off for one week.
You got Google right, just type it in and you'll find videos.Comment
Comment