Apples to Apples...Triple G's Resume.

[TonyGe]

LOL

Hopkins @ 36 would have CLOWNED Bumlovkin. Bernard's resume post his 36th birthday defecates and urinates on Bumlovkins. Please stop smoking the Crack. Bernard won the LEGIT LHW title in his mid 40's. Bumlovkin has yet to win the LEGIT MW title in his mid 30's. LOL..

So why according to you did it take Hopkins till his late fourties to get a legit title. Here comes the excuses..

[S7V7N]

This is the embarrassing thing about Golovkin's resume, fans are always trying to give him credit for fights he didn't even fight.
I like the guy but his resume is weak AF. That's just the way it is. I like Calzaghe too but his resume wasn't strong. Sometimes you gotta be honest.

Context is important when comparing resumes don't ya think? What opportunities were made available & did the athlete try to take on challenges when presented. All resume's are not created equal because not all have those same opportunities for one reason or another. This is why Golovkin being avoided in his prime is part of the context that needs weighed in evaluating talent. The same way NFL pro scouts evaluate DivII prospects that don't have the same chances to perform against the best. It's all about how one performs when given those same chances. It'll always be a question now since Golovkin is over the hill in terms of boxing prime, but it's a valid point that has merit & deserves consideration.

Let's remember Hagler fought three truly elite men. One a LW, and two WW's, yet he's the gold standard at MW.

Resume isn't the only thing, it's just one part of the equation.

[Nay_Sayer]

William Bo James
John David Jackson
Joe Lipsey
Andrew Council
Simon Brown
Robert Allen 3x
Antwun Echols 2x
Syd Vanderpool
Carl Daniels
Morrade Hakkar

Oh what a great list, right?

Pavlik
Tarver
Glen Johnson
Trinidad

Like I said, Hopkins' resume urinates and defecates all over Bumlovkin's

[Nay_Sayer]

So why according to you did it take Hopkins till his late fourties to get a legit title. Here comes the excuses..

LMAO

Hopkins won his first LEGIT title while in his mid 30's with his win over Trinidad, Einstein...

[Nay_Sayer]

This is why Golovkin being avoided in his prime is part of the context that needs weighed in evaluating talent.

Bumlovkin could have had the Froch, Lara or Ward fights. All are way more meaningful than the Martirosyans, Wades and Monroe Jrs of the world. Nobody was ducking Bumlovkin. the Lower Case G could have had the meaningful relevant fights earlier in his career if that's what Team Triple Duck really wanted...

[Nay_Sayer]

Let's remember Hagler fought three truly elite men. One a LW, and two WW's, yet he's the gold standard at MW..

LMAO

That LW and those two WWs individually have better wins @ 160 than does the Triple Duck.

[satiev1]

LOL

Hopkins @ 36 would have CLOWNED Bumlovkin. Bernard's resume post his 36th birthday defecates and urinates on Bumlovkins. Please stop smoking the Crack. Bernard won the LEGIT LHW title in his mid 40's. Bumlovkin has yet to win the LEGIT MW title in his mid 30's. LOL..

Hopkins at 36 loses to ggg. Bad style matchup. He wouldn't get past the jab and would get outworked UD. Taylor beat him twice already. Hopkins has several kinks in his armor. GGG has yet to lose.

[satiev1]

LMMFAO

VANES is a BUM. Period, end of. Your hero is 1-0-1 - with the win being at best controversial - against the two best names on his resume.

Hopkins' resume urinates and deficates on Bumlovkin's every day of the week and twice on Sunday...


Bumlovkin won his first legit title from Lemieux - a journeyman. Alvarez had *0* fights at the 160lb limit going into the Bumlovkin fight and, like Kell Brook, is a former WELTERWEIGHT. At minimum, Hopkins beat all of his Welters. What's Bumlovkin's problem?

Your boy charlo went life and death vanes and so did andrade. GGG sparked him in 2. Hopkins best win at MW was against a career welterweight in tito and a past prime de la hoya who was a career welterweight. LMAO at you hyping up mercardo. Alvarez and jacobs > tito all day long.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Pavlik
Tarver
Glen Johnson
Trinidad

Like I said, Hopkins' resume urinates and defecates all over Bumlovkin's

So what former welterweight champion should G fight to be legit in your eyes?

[satiev1]

Pavlik
Tarver
Glen Johnson
Trinidad

Like I said, Hopkins' resume urinates and defecates all over Bumlovkin's

GLEN JOHNSON is a journeyman. Trinidad and tarver were good wins. At 160 their resumes are not far off. Jacobs and alvarez would spark the one dimensional plodder pavlik out cold.