Enough is enough. Canelo ggg and saunders are three top dogs who bring in the most money in the division. These guys can't sit on the sidelines hoping for a payday. Do what ggg did when he started out. Wipe everyone until the champ has to vacate or fight you. They all need to fight each other instead of waiting for the next 22-22 guy.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charlo andrade jacobs and sergey need to fight each other
Collapse
-
Originally posted by satiev1 View PostEnough is enough. Canelo ggg and saunders are three top dogs who bring in the most money in the division. These guys can't sit on the sidelines hoping for a payday. Do what ggg did when he started out. Wipe everyone until the champ has to vacate or fight you.
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostThat's exactly what Charlo did. Canelo/GGG winner will have to vacate or fight him.
Sulaiman was pretty clear that if GGG didnt fight Canelo, then he had to fight Charlo.
So Golovkin having Saunders on standby (instead of charlo) tells me he is pretty much done worrying about what the ABCs might or might not do, and has no hesitation whatsoever about making a decision that will result in being stripped of yet another belt.....Last edited by OnePunch; 06-13-2018, 10:47 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by satiev1 View PostEnough is enough. Canelo ggg and saunders are three top dogs who bring in the most money in the division. These guys can't sit on the sidelines hoping for a payday. Do what ggg did when he started out. Wipe everyone until the champ has to vacate or fight you. They all need to fight each other instead of waiting for the next 22-22 guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostI was surprised to hear that Golovkin had Saunders locked in as a backup if the Canelo fight didnt get made.
Sulaman was pretty clear that if GGG didnt fight Canelo, then he had to fight Charlo.
So Golovkin having Saunders on standby (instead of charlo) tells me he is pretty much done worrying about what the ABCs might or might not do, and has no hesitation about making a decision that will result in being stripped of yet another belt.....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostThat's exactly what Charlo did. Canelo/GGG winner will have to vacate or fight him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostI was surprised to hear that Golovkin had Saunders locked in as a backup if the Canelo fight didnt get made.
Sulaiman was pretty clear that if GGG didnt fight Canelo, then he had to fight Charlo.
So Golovkin having Saunders on standby (instead of charlo) tells me he is pretty much done worrying about what the ABCs might or might not do, and has no hesitation whatsoever about making a decision that will result in being stripped of yet another belt.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Real King Kong View PostUnless the winner goes for a unification fight vs Saunders...that should take precedence and the wbc would probably grant an extension. It also remains to be seen if the wbc will enforce the mandatory like the ibf did.
Even Canelo got stripped by the WBC for not fighting the interim champion (GGG), so nobody should doubt whether the WBC would strip GGG (or Canelo) if it comes to that. Charlo might have to wait another year, but he'll get his shot or be upgraded to full champion eventually.
Comment
Comment