Comments Thread For: Trainer: Jacobs, Derevyanchenko Don't Need To Fight Right Now

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stealthradon
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2017
    • 3283
    • 108
    • 2
    • 30,404

    #21
    They are already ducking defending the IBF, lol

    Comment

    • juandabomb
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 2629
      • 107
      • 0
      • 21,659

      #22
      jacobs vs charlo
      derevyanchenko vs andrade
      ggg vs saunders
      carnelo vs o'sullivan


      there's your fights ...get it done promoters and managers

      Comment

      • DuckAdonis
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 7775
        • 197
        • 84
        • 188,446

        #23
        Everybody ducking them slick Ukranians

        Charlo/Andrade vs Derevyanchenko can happen... lets do it

        Comment

        • Butch.McRae
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2015
          • 4187
          • 153
          • 80
          • 22,548

          #24
          Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
          Is it that he can't or that he chose not to? I was under the impression that he wanted to maximize his energy while coming in as big as he could for the fight.

          Since Jacobs is #3 in the BIG, I would assume his last 2 fights have been sanctioned by the BIG, with same day weigh ins. I may be wrong though.
          You may be right, but I'd be very surprised if they were this thorough with the fighters on their rankings that aren't in eliminators or title fights.

          Comment

          • OnePunch
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9114
            • 1,305
            • 772
            • 2,453,131

            #25
            Originally posted by Butch.McRae
            You may be right, but I'd be very surprised if they were this thorough with the fighters on their rankings that aren't in eliminators or title fights.
            same day weigh ins by the IBF only occur in eliminators or title fights. Those are the only fights that are technically "sanctioned"

            Comment

            • kavi521
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2012
              • 647
              • 12
              • 1
              • 8,926

              #26
              Correct me if I'm wrong but Jacob missed the second-day weight in because he put on more than the allowed weight allowed by the IBF. No surprise he does not want to fight for the IBF belt

              Comment

              • Removed Now
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2017
                • 6255
                • 149
                • 74
                • 150,986

                #27
                Originally posted by White Willie
                Who is the #2 with IBF?
                There is no number 2. It's really crazy

                Comment

                • Butch.McRae
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2015
                  • 4187
                  • 153
                  • 80
                  • 22,548

                  #28
                  Originally posted by OnePunch
                  same day weigh ins by the IBF only occur in eliminators or title fights. Those are the only fights that are technically "sanctioned"
                  That's what I assumed. The budgets for these orgs are pretty thin. Didn't seem likely that they'd pay for this sort of oversight.

                  Comment

                  • bigdunny1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 14762
                    • 382
                    • 2
                    • 167,136

                    #29
                    Originally posted by OnePunch
                    do you actually believe this garbage?

                    I mean, for real, all joking aside. If you truly believe that a professional fighter, who has been fighting since probably the age of 7 or 8 is somehow "afraid" to box someone, then you really do need to get some help, because your brain doesnt function properly.
                    Your bytch azzz and the rest of the GGG fangirls have accused other fighters who refused to fight a mandatory of being afraid. But now that GGG is the one ducking and losing belts because of it we going to use the semantics and say it's not about being afraid? Whatever you want to call it afraid, too risky a fight ect. GGG could of fought his mandatory but chose a easier bum semi active 154lb Vanes instead. And even when he was told IBF wouldn't sanction it and would ONLY not strip him before the fight is if he agrees in writing to fight his mandatory after fighting Vanes he refused so bye bye belt. Now WBC coming for that belt too. I could give a phuk if your h0e azzz is sensitive about GGG being accused of being scared but you can't have it both ways and allow GGG and his groupies to accuse other fighters who did the same thing of being scared but cry now that shoe is on the other foot.

                    Comment

                    • W1LL
                      Celtic Warrior
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 11851
                      • 845
                      • 916
                      • 71,119

                      #30
                      Originally posted by JcLazyX210
                      There is no number 2. It's really crazy
                      That is weird. How can there be no number 2 but a number 3, 4 and 5? How is that logical?!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP