>>> Alvarez' resume is better than Lomachenko's...

[187 Proof]

What you should apologize for is calling Loma fans nuthuggers when you are a huge Canelo fan and an extreme hater of GGG and Loma. You are comparing Canelo's resume to Loma's resume when Canelo has had over 50 pro fights and Loma has only had about 11 pro fights. That isn't a fair comparison but you deliberately stacked the deck. How would Canelo have done against a tough champion boxer like Salido who came in well over weight and was allowed to hit low all fight if it was Canelo's 2nd pro fight? You have a hater's agenda to try to make Canelo better than Loma. Look at any reputable pound for pound best list and you will see Loma ranked higher than Canelo. In very few pro fights Loma has defeated a number of good world champions in a very dominate fashion. Canelo's wins over Lara and Trout were close wins that some viewers thought he deserved to lose although I thought he deserved the wins. I am a fan of both Canelo and Loma but you started this thread just to trash Loma and praise Canelo. They are both excellent boxers who currently fight in weight classes 25 pounds apart. It's clear all the deserved praise Loma is getting for his amazing accomplishments in the ring is driving you crazy.

Shut the f**k up, sissy. Canelo is 27 years old. Loma is 30 years old. Let that sink in.

[daggum]

when you draw with floyd and beat ggg 10-2 you have a better resume

[Red Bull]

when you draw with floyd and beat ggg 10-2 you have a better resume

😁😁😁😁 Great Corruption

[Nay_Sayer]

😁😁😁😁 Great Corruption

Losing to Floyd Mayweather isn't quite the same as losing to Orlando Salido.

Lol...

[xhiddenx87]

Losing to Floyd Mayweather isn't quite the same as losing to Orlando Salido.

Lol...

Still , lomachenko has a better resume with less fights.

Quality>Quantity

[Red Bull]

Losing to Floyd Mayweather isn't quite the same as losing to Orlando Salido.

Lol...

But that Loss was questionable. He didn't got gifts like Canelo.
114-114 draw after getting schooled by Floyd!
117-111 against Lara (gift win)
118-110 against GGG (another gift)
118-110 against Trout

[Nay_Sayer]

Still , lomachenko has a better resume with less fights.

Quality>Quantity

LOL

The only "quality" name on Lomachenko's resume is a guy who moved up not one but TWO weight classes. *Everyone* else on Lomachenko's resume is at best mediocre to straight garbage. The Lara win trumps ANYTHING Lomachenko has managed to do in the whole of his career...

[evets]

Why did people read any more of this than the title? It basically says "hey this guy who has been pro for longer than you has been in the ring with more people".

[SUBZER0ED]

I don't know how much credibility we can give this drug cheat, who made a career of fighting smaller and past-prime opponents in his made-up weight class.

[stealthradon]

LOL

The only "quality" name on Lomachenko's resume is a guy who moved up not one but TWO weight classes. *Everyone* else on Lomachenko's resume is at best mediocre to straight garbage. The Lara win trumps ANYTHING Lomachenko has managed to do in the whole of his career...

What quality names does Canelo have?

Less than 15 months of being away from the ring.
Less than 35 years at the time of the bout.
From the same division as Canelo.

Lara was coming off a 4-2-1
Look at how much of a joke Trout turned out to be. In his top 3 wins we have Tapia.

So who is left?