Originally posted by ThatDude44
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: If No Canelo - Then Golovkin Has To Face Charlo
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JohnCastellanos View PostThis would be some sweet karma! You know why because this was Canelos exact situation 2 years ago! Now this Diva Golovkin will be force to not only fight Charlo but also give Charlo a 40 percent split of the total purse! Seems fitting since Golovkin felt entitled to force Canelo to share that back then! And if he vacates guess who gets that belt without fighting for it!!! Ha ha ha!!!
Life’s a trip!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scary_canary View PostThis is bull****, the guy has done nothing wrong and it looks as though he’s gonna get stripped of either the ibf or the wbc....as much as I wanna see the charlo fight, surely the wbc mandatory was fulfilled last September and it’s the ibfs turn.... I’d rather see the charlo fight but I’d rather see Sergiy first if it means he can keep his belt
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Senor_frogs View PostYou said Fighting the besthe’s fought 2 good names and that’s it. You know who they are. The rest were cab drivers just like that Bum Vanes.
Geale was unified 160lb champ with two belts prior to fighting ggg.
Murray had just gotten robbed by Martinez the fight before ggg
Lemiuex was better than ANYONE Charlo has fought in his career
Brook was Spence ONLY MEANINGFUL OPPONENT WHILE GGG DEMOLISHED HIM BEFORE SPENCE GOT HIS ASHES...
GGG craps on USA boxing welfare system and you.
Comment
-
-
Are you a ***** which needs riding a **** of either of Canelo-GGG and considers others the same? I don't like any of them, let alone jerking on them so gtfoh yourself.
Comment
-
It's corruption to protect USA fighters
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostThat Golovkin fight Charlo as his next WBC mando is quite reasonable, what is less clear is where that stands in regards to Golovkin's defense rotation. If the WBC are now saying that Golovkin must either fight Canelo next or fight Charlo next or be stripped one would have thought they should have made that situation clear at an earlier stage (ie. when it became clear that Canelo would be available to fight in September). By taking this step now it appears that they are acting in a way that deliberately and directly impacts on Golovkin's chances of negotiating the best possible deal for himself.
It does appear to me that they are being somewhat partial towards Canelo here, but since their own rules allow them to do basically exactly as they please there probably ain't much Golovkin can do about it. Furthermore given that the IBF are already currently making a decision on whether Golovkin should be obligated to fight his mando for them next (presumably acting under agreement with the WBC that they were next in rotation) one would hope that the WBC take account of their previous arrangements both with the IBF and WBA.
EDIT: Actually the more I think about it the more distasteful this appears by the WBC. They had already agreed to waive their mandatory requirement for this cycle and that the IBF were next in rotation. IMO that was the incorrect decision (i'm big on guys fighting their mandos), but having made that decision to then reverse it at a crucial stage in negotiations (both between the IBF and GGG and between Canelo and GGG) is blatant and unashamed favouritism.
GGG will be freezed out by the establishment. They tried getting him beat but that didn't work even with corruption (weight cheats and scores plus drugs) do now they are freezing him out politically. Double standards in America right now in all politics to favor the weaker cultures.
Comment
Comment