Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: If No Canelo - Then Golovkin Has To Face Charlo

[Bronx2245]

Wow the most logical break down and it took to page 11 to get there green k sent. Couldn't of said it better myself.

Well thank you kind sir! Now, that being said, at 36, I think GGG should fight for the money, even if that means dropping the IBF belt! If no Canelo, then Saunders in London, or Murata in Tokoyo!

[BendOver]

This **** is too funny, right? I agree with you. Canelo did all they asked and the diva **** GGG tries making bull**** demands about $ when he doesn't bring much to the table. I would force his ass to fight both his mandatories or be stripped for his bull****.

So ginger got suspended and the rematch cancelled because of it. And thtat is ggg fault, why? ginger is the diva here not ggg.

[187 Proof]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahah a!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Nay_Sayer]

Do you guys really think Charlo is a big threat to GGG? He's a good fighter but I don't see it.

Charlo beats Bumlovkin - which is the reason why Unable Dirty Sanchez keeps talking down the fight. Team Triple Duck wants NO part of Charlo...

[Drew Bundini Br]

Finally out of all of the fights he's had, GG will be fighting his 3rd A list fighter. Let's hope the CHARLO fight comes off.

[Drew Bundini Br]

WBC trying to use a foreign fighter who actually fights the best in order to build up a current or future North American money maker, just like HBO and Vegas tried to do with GGG-Canelo I and Kovalev-Ward I and II, just like they all tried to do with May-Pac (not the fight itself, but using the foreign fighter with an exciting style AND exciting opponents to build the name of the American boxer who didn't have an exciting style and was not willing to fight exciting opponents).

Same bull****, different day. I also want to see GGG-Charlo on a fair playing field but if the past is anything to by, this is just the start of the ****ery where they will try to screw GGG over in favor of building up a younger, North American star. That Charlo is advised by Haymon just makes it even juicier for the WBC which seems to be run by Al Haymon now. If people think Bob Arum's relationship with the WBO is bad, Haymon's hold over the WBC is twice as bad.

This will be great for boxing. GG needs no more tomato cans. He is now fighting only his 3rd A list fighter.

[alexjust]

This is not an act of oral sex performed on Canelo as some were saying here, it goes a bit deeper than that. Pun..

WBC openly sides with Canelo and effectively blackmails its own champion to take a fight. Why would Charlo be mandatory if GGG does not fight Canelo? Fight with Canelo is not a unification. No matter how much respect WBC seemed to have shown GGG before, they clearly show who their favourite is. It is de****able how WBC behaves.

I hope all this politics will not ruin GGG's career.

[Sweet_Science2]

And to think all these lil g fans was scared of the Charlo fight. But when Canelo said he would fight: Jacobs, Charlo, Spike, or Saunders. All of pussie g fans said Canelo would fight Spike suggesting Canelo would duck Saunders, Charlo, and Jacobs.

I'm so glad that pussie g has to fight one of these young Lions. Charlo knocks pussie g smooth the fuuck out. I wonder how pussie g is going to try and weasel his way out of this one. You have D-Chenko or Charlo as it looks like the Canelo fight is not happening in September.

I Love this shyt. The walls are closing in.

[-Johannes-]

Well thank you kind sir! Now, that being said, at 36, I think GGG should fight for the money, even if that means dropping the IBF belt! If no Canelo, then Saunders in London, or Murata in Tokoyo!

Do you think the IBF would grant another extension given the following scenario?

GGG does fight Charlo(Ranked No4* by the IBF)
No1 and No3 ranked by the IBF share the same managment team so it's unlikely they would fight each other. So no Jacobs vs Derevyanchenko.

Offering No1 Contender Derevyanchenko a shot against the winner.

In the mean time Canelo fights Spike and Jacobs fights anyone maybe Saunders/Murray winner? The most viable outcome would be

Canelo vs Jacobs May 2019

Canelo/Jacobs/saunders vs GGG/Charlo/Derevyanchenko September 2019?

[Bronx2245]

Do you think the IBF would grant another extension given the following scenario?

GGG does fight Charlo(Ranked No4* by the IBF)
No1 and No3 ranked by the IBF share the same managment team so it's unlikely they would fight each other. So no Jacobs vs Derevyanchenko.

Offering No1 Contender Derevyanchenko a shot against the winner.

In the mean time Canelo fights Spike and Jacobs fights anyone maybe Saunders/Murray winner? The most viable outcome would be

Canelo vs Jacobs May 2019

Canelo/Jacobs/saunders vs GGG/Charlo/Derevyanchenko September 2019?

NO! GGG can't choose to fight the IBF #4, over the IBF #1! GGG should've fought the IBF #1, over Vanes Martirosyan! That was his pass! I think the IBF will give GGG another pass if he fights in a unification bout, but nothing less!