Comments Thread For: Canelo Willing To Fight Saunders in September, Says Gomez

[TheFrog]

How about Vanes??? U LOVED that one soo much.

Haha that was BS too
A clear attempt to create a Golovkin highlight so they can say "Look he's still a beast everyone!"
I'm not thrilled with either guy at the moment.
Canelo is just more fun to pick on because he is such a diva and his fans seem to like that about him.

[aboutfkntime]

Fcuk you, sshole.

interesting point

do you have a link for that ?

sorry for standing on your girlfriend's toes

[chubuk7]

man you tards say the dumbest things lol

Oh!.. This is coming from the one who fell out of an ugly tree and hit every branch on the way? Ignorant.

[chubuk7]

Haha that was BS too
A clear attempt to create a Golovkin highlight so they can say "Look he's still a beast everyone!"
I'm not thrilled with either guy at the moment.
Canelo is just more fun to pick on because he is such a diva and his fans seem to like that about him.

At the end Clenelo will fight O’Sullivan or Lemieux. That was the initial plan from the beginning – ODLH is back to playing games once again, when it comes to the rematch between GGG & Clenelo. He will never allows Clenelo to fight GGG without clenbuterol, LOL.

[aboutfkntime]

Gennady could be stripped by the IBF, which will be Canelo's fault..... so, Canelo should pay Golovkin a higher split

are you fkn ******ed ?

FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko..... but no, he preferred to select yet another no-hoper

FACT: you simply cannot blame Canelo for a decision that was made by Golovkin lol

that is real fcuk-boy logic right there

FACT: I told you all that Pvssykin was INTENTIONALLY wasting a valuable fight-date, and subsequently creating an impossible log-jam in September..... by selecting a NO-HOPER like Vanes, to enable him to tie Hopkins record..... but, now you guys are trying to blame Canelo looooool

fkn ******s

[whoseyourdaddy]

So it's all about the money, no pursuit of greatness? That's sad, thank God great fighters before now didn't have the same opinion.

How in hell, Fighting Marthyrosian persuing greatness?? are you that deluded? the mando has 11 pro fights in his resume and GGG ducked it, Now he is pursuing Money asking 50-50 purse. 2 years ago he accused Canelo of being a business man, well now he is trying to be one, everyone agreed with GGG back then because they hated Canelo, now that this hypocrite is doing it is OK. nothing bugs me more than hypocrites, and GGG fans are the biggest of them all.

[chubuk7]

are you fkn ******ed ?
FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko..... but no, he preferred to select yet another no-hoper
FACT: you simply cannot blame Canelo for a decision that was made by Golovkin lol
that is real fcuk-boy logic right there
FACT: I told you all that Pvssykin was INTENTIONALLY wasting a valuable fight-date, and subsequently creating an impossible log-jam in September..... by selecting a NO-HOPER like Vanes, to enable him to tie Hopkins record..... but, now you guys are trying to blame Canelo looooool
fkn ******s

You know what I would find if I looked up idiot in the dictionary (Their response -a picture of you?) No a definition of an idiot which you are.

[Boxing lives]

It only makes sense for Canelo to fight Saunders. Well obviously if he steps up to Jacobs that would be better but we all know he ain't about to do that. Get that strap from no draw Saunders. BJ will come to Vegas for that PPV money if he has any sense. He could possibly out box Canelo. Its highly competitive. I favor Canelo. Golovkin planned to duck the September fight all along and fight Derev. We could see that coming a mile away. If Canelo fights O Sullivan or Lemieux thats a weak move by ginger though. I'm not even gonna bring up Charlo. No way in hell Canelo mans up and takes that fight.

[Robi13]

You know what I would find if I looked up idiot in the dictionary (Their response -a picture of you?) No a definition of an idiot which you are.

EBERYthing he said to you is true, why is he an idiot?

[aboutfkntime]

are you fkn ******ed ?

FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko..... but no, he preferred to select yet another no-hoper

FACT: you simply cannot blame Canelo for a decision that was made by Golovkin lol

that is real fcuk-boy logic right there

FACT: I told you all that Pvssykin was INTENTIONALLY wasting a valuable fight-date, and subsequently creating an impossible log-jam in September..... by selecting a NO-HOPER like Vanes, to enable him to tie Hopkins record..... but, now you guys are trying to blame Canelo looooool

fkn ******s

You know what I would find if I looked up idiot in the dictionary (Their response -a picture of you?) No a definition of an idiot which you are.

how is it possibly acceptable, or appropriate..... to blame one man, for a decision that was made by another man?

what is wrong with you ?

FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko..... but no, he preferred to select another NO-HOPER.....

grow up and hold a grown man accountable for his own decisions