Comments Thread For: The Unfortunate Reality of Canelo-GGG Rematch Negotiations
Collapse
-
Lighten up bubba. In case you hadn't noticed lately, Americans aren't so fond of Russia these days after they feked with our prez election. But hey, keep making a big deal over nuthin' much, friend. I call that deflectorama. And no, I'm not even remotely nervous.Comment
-
Canelo's PPV drawing power is being severely overrated. When he's not facing a big name like Cotto, Mayweather, GGG, or even a Chavez he struggled to do over 500K. He did less than 500K vs. Liam Smith, Lara and Khan. There's no reason to suggest that he can even approach the 1.3M buys that he had against Golovkin, should he face Charlo, Jacobs or O'Sullivan. His drawing power is greater than Golovkin's, but he's also not going to be making $20 or $40M, as Oscar suggests, without Golovkin either.
If they want to make the most money, they should fight each other in September.
Also, the idea that Oscar is going to put in Canelo in with a Jacobs or a Charlo, before he faces Golovkin, is laughable too. Even Ellerbe called him out on it. They're going to be facing Spike next.Comment
-
Lol, see what happens when you bite the hand that feeds you?
Now you can’t be a “real Russian hero”, like the guy in the Armageddon movie man.
I would’ve fought canelo with or without the testing for
10Mil or so...Comment
-
10% more is high side and where you would start. I'd say if last fight was 40/60% then 45/55% is fair. DLH could probably even get them to 43/57%. It all comes down to how much does Canelo want to make the fight and how much more does Golovkin want. I think 45/55 is about right.
Why Canelo should fight:
1) He needs some redemption for his his dirty test, he doesn't fight Golovkin it hurts his prestige
2) Most people thought he lost the first fight
3) This is the biggest payday he can make
Why Golovkin should make the fight
1) Chance to show what he can do against a clean Canelo
2) There is no bigger pay day for him, by far
Both guys have a financial reason to make the fight happen. Canelo will lose money in short and possibly long term. Golovkin will clearly as well. From a reputation and historical perspective Canelo has more to lose.Comment
-
No it is much worse than fighting Vanes. He has more than 3 months to pick an opponent not less than 30 days.Comment
-
He is a coke head boxer who is in his late forties. And he has other weird sht going on.Comment
-
Canelo's PPV drawing power is being severely overrated. When he's not facing a big name like Cotto, Mayweather, GGG, or even a Chavez he struggled to do over 500K. He did less than 500K vs. Liam Smith, Lara and Khan. There's no reason to suggest that he can even approach the 1.3M buys that he had against Golovkin, should he face Charlo, Jacobs or O'Sullivan. His drawing power is greater than Golovkin's, but he's also not going to be making $20 or $40M, as Oscar suggests, without Golovkin either.
If they want to make the most money, they should fight each other in September.
Also, the idea that Oscar is going to put in Canelo in with a Jacobs or a Charlo, before he faces Golovkin, is laughable too. Even Ellerbe called him out on it. They're going to be facing Spike next.Comment
-
This is all speculation and talk. Give us 3 things or dont talk about it at all.
1. Purse split for first fight.
2. Purse split on the signed contract for the rematch
3. Purse split GGG is now asking for
Otherwise all talk and speculation.Comment
-
Okay I stand corrected about the age thing. The author of the article was saying that Oscar is following Mayweather’s playbook and I was simply agreeing with it. Mayweather despite his age is on an entirely different level than Canelo. But you’re right. My comparison concerning Floyd and Manny’s age was not accurate. I guess I got fired up when I read the article 😳Comment
Comment