-
-
Lol...show me where I've said anything that would indicate skin colour having an influence. And you're the one who brought up charlo. You said ggg has to fight charlo or Jacobs or you'll lose respect for him or something along those lines. Charlo has beaten next to nobody, and no better fighters at 160 than the ibf mandatory guy...so I guess that makes him a marginally better opponent. If ggg wants to keep his ibf, he's gotta fight that guy, simple as that. I'd rather see Canelo, Saunders or Jacobs personally.Comment
-
Unfortunately you're opinion is in the minority, most people saw it the other way. It was a close fight though. Neither one whooped each others azz, anyone who says so is either a dumbazz or a nuthuggerComment
-
GGG better look for another oponent, Canelo is the A side. Canelo did the hair follicle test, that tells you the clenbuterol thing was an accident if you will. It would be nice if both fight with different oponents on Sept 16, letīs see who draws more people....Comment
-
This isn't about skin color having an influence Chris, I mean Consider...lmao. Charlo' resume ****s all over Derevyanchenko yet you said this
"Yea...I got no love for sanctioning bodies, but I understand fighters wanting to keep belts. It won't be the first time in history a guy fights his mandatory. Charlo is another guy who's proven jack **** at mw who's a mandatory too, so I guess you don't like that fight either. This whole situation is on Canelo anyway...the fight would have happened already"
You had to get even huh lol. You think I'm dissing the white guy so you dis the black guy lol lol. Charlo's resume ****s all over Derevyanchenkos lmao, yet you felt compelled to mention him. Then you have the nerve to say, "I guess you don't like that fight either", lmmfao rotf. I know the deal. It's not that serious lol.
You like the GG's and Loma's, fine. I like ALL of them from GG, Loma, Canelo, Charlo, and Derev but Derev isn't deserving of a title shot and I can speak objectively on that. I have real, legit reasons why I criticize any fighter. You just go the opposite route when you think that GG or Loma are being dissed. It doesn't have to be a black fighter. But it felt that way lol...
It could be anyone who is not GG or Loma and you'll critique who ever it is. But the funny thing is I'm on GG's side, yet you felt compelled to dis Charlo who is more qualified to face GG than Derev, lmao.
Derevyanchenko has NO resume...and somehow he reached mandatory status. Now say he deserves his ranking. I dare ya lol...
You ask the fans who they want to see GG Derev or GG Charlo, and you do the math lol... No alts.
And for the record, I didn't have to go this route. I could've just let you say what you said and moved on. But a conman can't con an ex con lmao.Comment
-
Lol...ok. You brought up charlo, he was relevant to the discussion. I mentioned him in the context of mandatory challengers, which he also is. You're going out of your way to make this about race. You're acting like I want the ibf mandatory fight or something...I'm just saying, if the ibf doesn't grant an extension, he's gotta fight him to keep the belt. If the wbc gave ggg a deadline, I'd be saying the same thing about him fighting charlo.
On the topic of charlo...who's he really fought? What has he done at mw that's any better than the ibf mando? Your reasoning for hating on one mandatory fight should apply to the other.
Imo ggg's priorities should look something like:
1. canelo rematch
2. Bjs for the wbo belt
3. Jacobs rematch
4. Whatever mandatory is being enforced.
...but according to you, charlo somehow jumps to the front of the line. Ok.Comment
Tweet
Comment