My top 10 pfp best today.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I don't see what the problem is with this guy. Loma has 12 fights and he's ranked 6th pfp and they think that im some sort of troll, lmao. Walters never beat anyone but smallish feathers and bantams.
Russell. He beat an ancient Jhonny Gonzalez.
Walters beat a Donaire who wasn't even a true FW and beat the guy Donaire knocked out, in Darchinian, and beat Rigo who had to come up two weight classes and got a good win over Linares who beat who? Yet im supposed to rank Loma the best pfp fighter over guys like GG, Garcia who beat Salido, Bud and Canelo? Foh, lmao.
Canelo lost, but who did he lose to. Who did Loma lose to. I do my homework and don't hate fighters on pigment or any of that cowardly **** like that Nay lol...Last edited by Raggamuffin; 05-22-2018, 11:16 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Really?
Last I checked, Crawford doesn't have a LOSS.
I'm sorry to inform you but *losses* figure into to the equation and, the fact of the mattter is, Crawford doesn't lose to the Orlando Salidos of the world.
Crawford has the better resume.Comment
-
So best wins isn't a way to measure resumes? I'll take Loma's best 4 wins over Crawford's best win and his best 6 over Crawford's best 6 is a larger sampling. He's defeated more champions, more unbeaten champions and the only one to defeat a p4p rated fighter.
Then you've got Lundy, Jean, Molina etc; they aren't much better than the likes of Marriaga, Piryipino etc;
I have no dog in this either. These two are my two favorite fighters and I have no preference of one or the other. I just think Loma is the better overall talent and owns the better resume to date. I think I'm in the majority there.
Both IMO are great fighters and just about entering their primes. I think both will dominate for a while but unfortunately I suspect Crawford will find it harder getting the better matches due to PBC having most the players at 147.Comment
-
Losses can be circumstancial. A controversial loss where a large majority think he won in his second pro fight after the opponent failed to make weight by a long way then refused to step on the scale next day and throw over 100 low blows without penalty should be put into better perspective and it is by folks without an agenda.
So in your opinion Bernard Hopkins was never good due to a debut loss? Henry Armstrong, Juan Manuel Marquez, Alexis Arguello were never as good as Sven Ottke since they lost early fights and early title attempts?
The undefeated Thai who's 50-0 is better than any fighter who's active and has a loss?
If Crawford turned pro fighting guys like Salido, Russell, Walters, Rigo he'd have a couple losses. I've seen his early fights. If Loma turned pro fighting Crawford's opp he'd probably have lost only a round or two in 32 fights.Last edited by chrisJS; 05-22-2018, 11:26 PM.Comment
-
Exactly.
There's no shame in losing to a guy like Floyd. *Everybody* loses to Floyd. The same can't be said of losing to a guy like Orlando Salido - and there is NO ****ing way in hell you can justify ranking someone who has a LOSS to Orlando Salido over guys like Garcia, Crawford, Golovkin, Alvarez, Thruman, Rungvisia, etc...Comment
-
The Ring does NOT determine who is or who isn't #1 and #2 in a given division.
Please stop with that foolishness.
Linares was champion of NOTHING...Comment
-
Apart from the WBA and WBC so not exactly nothing.
Anyway you are a broken record and beyond repair. I know your agenda.
Peace.Comment
Comment