My top 10 pfp best today.

[Raggamuffin]

Lol Crawford. What's his best win again? ..

Rungvisai has better wins than anyone in that list. Also, half of your "A big fight away" list has better wins than Crawford.

Rungvisai didn’t beat
Román the first time, stopped him the 2nd time and imo didn’t beat Estrada. Foh with your lunacy. Román went for history and Rung is just beating guys who are smaller than him. Barely at that.

[chrisJS]

Your logic is flawed and what you said about Spence is why you rank Loma so high. Flawed logic.

You didn't even know there hasn't been a lineal champion at 126-135 during that time. Lol. If you did why bring it up as a point? Clearly it's to bash a fighter you've got a problem that's deeper than boxing with.

I'd be interested to see your take on that. Will you admit you didn't know that or will you pretend there was a lineal?

[chrisJS]

Rungvisai didn’t beat
Román the first time, stopped him the 2nd time and imo didn’t beat Estrada. Foh with your lunacy. Román went for history and Rung is just beating guys who are smaller than him. Barely at that.

He holds the official wins and that's all that matters for you I've heard you say before and circumstances don't matter.

If the beating smaller guy is such an issue with Rung and Loma why is it not with your #1? Crawford walks around in the 175-180 range and clearly had size advantages for years. I don't have an issue with the guys if they can make the weight they make it I'm just pointing to your hypocrisy and clear twisting of your own rules to suit your own agendas and biases.

[Nay_Sayer]

thurman above loma

Thurman is undefeated and has a better resume...

[Raggamuffin]

He holds the official wins and that's all that matters for you I've heard you say before and circumstances don't matter.

If the beating smaller guy is such an issue with Rung and Loma why is it not with your #1?

Crawford walks around in the 175-180 range and clearly had size advantages for years.

I don't have an issue with the guys if they can make the weight

Flawed logic again lmao.

[Raggamuffin]

You didn't even know there hasn't been a lineal champion at 126-135 during that time. Lol. If you did why bring it up as a point? Clearly it's to bash a fighter you've got a problem that's deeper than boxing with.

I'd be interested to see your take on that. Will you admit you didn't know that or will you pretend there was a lineal?

Lmao. This is about as pathetic as it gets. And all over Loma too lol...

[chrisJS]

Flawed logic again lmao.

I'm not even trying to push a logic I'm simply saying your rules.

Can you tell me about those lineal champs from 126-135 again? LOL

[chrisJS]

Lmao. This is about as pathetic as it gets. And all over Loma too lol...

Who were the lineal champs again? I'm waiting. I'm interested to see what and who you have in mind.

[Raggamuffin]

I'm not even trying to push a logic I'm simply saying your rules.

Can you tell me about those lineal champs from 126-135 again? LOL

What's the reason that you need to know about this? Bud is the last lineal champion at 135. I'm not talking about 126 or 130. You can't create your own argument based off of my post, lmao. Foh lol...

[chrisJS]

What's the reason that you need to know about this? Bud is the last lineal champion at 135. I'm not talking about 126 or 130. You can't create your own argument based off of my post, lmao. Foh lol...

You used the "he's never defeated a lineal" as a way to bring him down. But there's never been a lineal at his weight. Crawford also won the lineal that didn't really exist his was based on the rings #1 and 2 at 135 facing each other after Marquez had vacated. Linares did the same he beat the #2 whilst he was #1 so he got the rings title and was just as lineal.

But my point is how can you beat a lineal champ if one doesn't exist and thus use that against a fighter?