Comments Thread For: Is There Any Doubt That Lomachenko Is #1 Pound For Pound?

[Shadoww702]

Exactly! Tripps me out how some fools call Fighters from other countries bums just cause they've never heard of them or never seen them fight before.
Lipnets gave Mikey a hell of a fight and we all know Mikey is no scrub.
Lipnets is a very good fighter and he'll give anyone a tough fight!

Yup! Ppl act like someone suks and is a bum because they dont know a fighter or seen any of his fights.

[aboutfkntime]

Canelo lost that fight and got a gift

Loma just stopped Linares, who was much bigger than him

truth be known, Golovkin could have lost to both Jacobs and Canelo

#1) Lomachenko
#2) Crawford
#3) Garcia

those guys search for challenges..... especially Loma, he is trying to reach for greatness

but Golovkin always looks for the easy way out, never challenging himself, never lifting a finger to make a meaningful fight..... and he will never consider taking a fight unless it happens on his terms, even with superstars..... which is why his resume is so poor

there is a huge difference between Lomachenko and Chickenkin

[aboutfkntime]

unlike Golovkin, Lomachenko actually WILL fight anyone

unlike Golovkin, Lomachenko actually does want to fight the best

and Loma did not run around for YEARS talking **** and making silly promises that he was never going to keep

there is light and day between those two fighters

[5burowz]

loma is running thru his comp. made russell look pedestrian. made walters retire. made rigo quit. and destroyed a much bigger guy in linares. if he isnt #1, then nobody is.

[aboutfkntime]

Loma does everything he can to make BIG fights

Golovkin does everything he can to avoid BIG fights

how is it possible that some fans want to compare them lol ?

look what Loma achieved in 10 fights..... compared to what Golovkin achieved in 10 years lol

when Loma refuses to fight, citing a bunch of ridiculous excuses..... THEN you can compare them

[Shadoww702]

Loma just stopped Linares, who was much bigger than him

truth be known, Golovkin could have lost to both Jacobs and Canelo

#1) Lomachenko
#2) Crawford
#3) Garcia

those guys search for challenges..... especially Loma, he is trying to reach for greatness

but Golovkin always looks for the easy way out, never challenging himself, never lifting a finger to make a meaningful fight..... and he will never consider taking a fight unless it happens on his terms, even with superstars..... which is why his resume is so poor

there is a huge difference between Lomachenko and Chickenkin

This is the 2nd time today I read someone's top 3 P4P list being just like yours???

[TSS]

Are we talking about the guy who just got dropped by a B-level fighter? OK, just checking.

[alexjust]

I'm going to start reporting every single racist, ******, f**king comment like this... stop with the racist ****. If you are racist, it's because you're either insecure, an ass hole, completely ignorant, or all of the above.

Please do. And I'll support you. And report yourself for ******ity and inability to understand basic stuff. Accusing someone of racism in an attempt to explain something irrational (like I speculated) does not make me a racist, you imbecil. I will not dignify your ******ity by any further discussion with you or other morons here, who see the word "black" and immediately assume racism. There is nothing racist about me or my comment, dumbass.

[Vlad_]

Loma just stopped Linares, who was much bigger than him

truth be known, Golovkin could have lost to both Jacobs and Canelo

#1) Lomachenko
#2) Crawford
#3) Garcia

those guys search for challenges..... especially Loma, he is trying to reach for greatness

but Golovkin always looks for the easy way out, never challenging himself, never lifting a finger to make a meaningful fight..... and he will never consider taking a fight unless it happens on his terms, even with superstars..... which is why his resume is so poor

there is a huge difference between Lomachenko and Chickenkin

So Jacobs and Canelo were bums fight? Is he the one that made the rematch against Canelo void? Are you sure that GGG is the one who avoided some fighters, and not the other way around?

[Lomasexual]

Who cares about number of fights. He’s thirty. He doesn’t get a pass just because he chose the beat up on teenagers into his mid twenties.

Either:

1) His extended amateur career was equal in value to turning pro younger, and therefore his lack of pro fights is meaningless and he shouldn't get kudos.

or

2) He was beating up on teenagers, and he gained no useful experience from it.

You can't have it both ways.

Seems like you are posting irrationally, and can safely be dismissed as a hater.