Is Terence Crawford the most overrated boxer?

[4truth]

Is Terence Crawford the guy whose best win is a natural 125lb fighter who was coming back from a year lay off... Is that guy the most overrated boxer...???

Sorry but I read this post several times and honestly have no idea who/what you are talking about.

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/BqmMllWNawKs0/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Pigeons]

Lineal titles
Crawford 2
Golovkin 0


Undisputed titles
Crawford 1
Golovkin 0

[M Bison]

Hes beat an undersized shot gamboa and postol. Not impressed. IDK how hes P4P

Simple, he isn't in the top 5 P4P list of anyone who actually watches the sport.
How can you have him ahead of GGG, AJ, Spence, Rungvisai, and Lomachenko?

[Bad_Guy]

He beats Spence or Thurman then he's 100 percent legit amd would go rigght near top of my list but them guys are miles ahead of what he's fought so far.

Fair enough. I doubt many people will give him credit for Thurman though after the hiatus/marriage, but I agree.

[Floyd is TBE]

We're talking Welterweight here. Didn't you read the thread title.

I read the title. The **** are you talking about?

[boxinggod101]

NO, GGG is the most overrated boxer

acutally GGG has better wins..

[boxinggod101]

Overrated? Perhaps not. Prematurely rated, definitely so.

He looks like the real deal to me.

very well said

[Mr. 29K]

NO, GGG is the most overrated boxer

Green k for being a real boxing aficionado

[Mr. 29K]

Someone just said that he would beat all 90's Welters except Pernell and Tito. What has he done to be favored over the likes of Oscar, Curry, Mosley, Quartely, and Vernon?

He’s up there with Triple She.

[chrisJS]

Simple, he isn't in the top 5 P4P list of anyone who actually watches the sport.
How can you have him ahead of GGG, AJ, Spence, Rungvisai, and Lomachenko?

Because with the exception of Lomachenko he's a better boxer than all of those guys. Pound for pound isn't best resume it's term is supposed to be "If all were the same size who'd be the best".

Also my question for those slamming Crawford is what else could he have done to this point?

He cleaned out at 135. He beat the #1, the #2 and he also beat the guy (Gamboa) who was #1 at 126, 130 and was highly ranked at 135. He moved to 140 and won every single belt with ease.

The fashion of the victories really helps too. He's dominating these guys without barely losing a round and he is a complete boxer. Seems people are trying to say not only does he have a poor resume but he also has an average skill set. GGG got a lot of credit because of the fashion of the victories and his obvious tool set and rightly so even though he wasn't beating murderers row.

Also, Spence? Really? If Crawford is lacking Spence is severely lacking.