Just rewatched Golovkin vs Jacobs

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35717
    • 3,848
    • 3,389
    • 378,304

    #31
    Originally posted by daggum
    there are some fights that just cant be scored for certain guys

    jacobs did not win 7 rounds. you would have to give him a clear ggg round.

    ward did not win 7 rounds you would have to give him a clear kovalev round.

    linares did not win 5 rounds you would have to give him a clear lomachenko round.

    i know on paper it looks like you can sneakily give him an extra round but for people who actually pay attention its just not there. stop trying to manufacture it. it will never be there. maybe if they change the way boxign is scored sure. you should start lobbying for that.
    You're one of the biggest, biased crybabies here. Go watch artorias you delusional clown.

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43751
      • 4,678
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #32
      Originally posted by Mammoth
      You're one of the biggest, biased crybabies here. Go watch artorias you delusional clown.
      jacobs didn't win 7 rounds. why are you pretending? ward didn't win 7 rounds why are you pretending? let me guess you gave jacobs round 1. we can stop right there cause you simply can't score boxing. what reasons do you have for jacobs winning round 1 bearing in mind he was outlanded and ggg had the higher quality punches? he didn't get completely dominated isn't a legit reason. he kept it close isn't a legit reason. the punches are what matter.

      Comment

      • uppercut510
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2016
        • 7071
        • 430
        • 210
        • 51,945

        #33
        i dont see how people say jacobs won, gggee won it imo jacobs did well, just funny that how afterwards he became this great fighter but before he was this chinny bum who geegg was going to destroy. all those posts of the pirog ko smh

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43751
          • 4,678
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #34
          ok just watched round 1 of ggg-jacobs again. there is simply no way jacobs won that round. ggg landed at least 6 heavy jabs that jolted jacobs head around. jacobs landed 2 punches that jolted ggg's head(1 jab and 1 jab/hook byrid) around and imo they weren't as clean or hard and they didn't move ggg as much as ggg's punches moved jacobs head. jacobs also landed 2 decent jabs to the body. both guys landed some meh jabs with not much on them that weren't very clean. you somehow come up with jacobs on top after all that? yet i'm biased? pretty sure it says clean punching in the rules and there is no way in hell jacobs won clean punchin in that round. maybe you have another excuse? ring generalship he was going backwards and getting his head snapped back so well that you had to give it to him. should we do round 3 next? round 2 is a real debatable round but obviously thats an auto round to jacobs for you.
          Last edited by daggum; 05-17-2018, 09:17 PM.

          Comment

          • Mammoth
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 35717
            • 3,848
            • 3,389
            • 378,304

            #35
            Originally posted by daggum
            ok just watched round 1 of ggg-jacobs again. there is simply no way jacobs won that round. ggg landed at least 6 heavy jabs that jolted jacobs head around. jacobs landed 2 punches that jolted ggg's head(1 jab and 1 jab/hook byrid) around and imo they weren't as clean or hard and they didn't move ggg as much as ggg's punches moved jacobs head. jacobs also landed 2 decent jabs to the body. both guys landed some meh jabs with not much on them that weren't very clean. you somehow come up with jacobs on top after all that? yet i'm biased? pretty sure it says clean punching in the rules and there is no way in hell jacobs won clean punchin in that round. maybe you have another excuse? ring generalship he was going backwards and getting his head snapped back so well that you had to give it to him. should we do round 3 next? round 2 is a real debatable round but obviously thats an auto round to jacobs for you.
            What a crybaby.....

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43751
              • 4,678
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #36
              Originally posted by Mammoth
              What a crybaby.....
              great breakdown. you convinced me. jacobs 114-113 ggg

              Comment

              • Mammoth
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 35717
                • 3,848
                • 3,389
                • 378,304

                #37
                Originally posted by daggum
                great breakdown. you convinced me. jacobs 114-113 ggg
                Rounds 1,2,6,7,8,10 and 11 to Jacobs.... It's an opinion that will make you cry but it's mine to have. Round 3 could also go to Jacobs.

                Comment

                • daggum
                  All time great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 43751
                  • 4,678
                  • 3
                  • 166,270

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mammoth
                  Rounds 1,2,6,7,8,10 and 11 to Jacobs.... It's an opinion that will make you cry but it's mine to have. Round 3 could also go to Jacobs.
                  yes like i said we can stop at round 1. jacobs didn't win that. its not debatable. you are fanboying out. his head was snapped back violently over and over while he only landed a couple decent shots himself. why not just say he won every round? round 3 he was dominated. you simply have no idea what you are watching

                  Comment

                  • Mammoth
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 35717
                    • 3,848
                    • 3,389
                    • 378,304

                    #39
                    Originally posted by daggum
                    yes like i said we can stop at round 1. jacobs didn't win that. its not debatable. you are fanboying out. his head was snapped back violently over and over while he only landed a couple decent shots himself. why not just say he won every round? round 3 he was dominated. you simply have no idea what you are watching
                    You really are a delusional fanboy. I'm a big fan of Golovkin. Can't say I don't blame the fanboys for getting the **** they get though....

                    Comment

                    • daggum
                      All time great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 43751
                      • 4,678
                      • 3
                      • 166,270

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Mammoth
                      You really are a delusional fanboy. I'm a big fan of Golovkin. Can't say I don't blame the fanboys for getting the **** they get though....
                      so you scored round 1 to the guy who was outlanded and who had his head violently snapped back by power jabs over and over why??? im still trying to make sense of that. ah yes thats like the trump racist defense. hey i wouldn't be racist but you are calling me one anyway so im just gonna be racist to make you mad! ggg won that round. it doesn't matter if you like him or not. if you score it for jacbos you either can't score, can't see or don't like him

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP