Comments Thread For: Lomachenko-Linares Had Peak Viewership of 1,749,000 on ESPN

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bballchump11
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 4898
    • 739
    • 1,553
    • 53,366

    #11
    That's good to hear. The average was low, but maybe people showed up late

    Comment

    • AL_Camino
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 2455
      • 94
      • 26
      • 20,340

      #12
      Im happy that many people saw the fight. It deserved a good audience and hopefully helps viewership on future espn shows.

      Comment

      • sicko
        The Truth Hurts
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2010
        • 34211
        • 2,594
        • 839
        • 151,307

        #13
        Great Peak Number especially for a Boxing Event!

        Comment

        • man down
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2018
          • 23452
          • 3,777
          • 5,102
          • 367,838

          #14
          Lol yesterday it was "low numbers"

          Comment

          • asgarth
            Moderator
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 3180
            • 268
            • 144
            • 36,835

            #15
            The event started early right? Maybe that was the reason for the weak starting numbers, but 1,7 mio peak sounds pretty decent.

            Comment

            • BucaRican
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 937
              • 45
              • 1
              • 7,675

              #16
              I bet it peaked right around the time Loma got put on his culo. But it is good, if fights are as good as Loma vs Linares, word will get out.

              Comment

              • minemax
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Oct 2017
                • 799
                • 23
                • 259
                • 25,796

                #17
                Originally posted by man down
                Lol yesterday it was "low numbers"
                There were different numbers yesterday.

                Comment

                • mvooom
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2017
                  • 381
                  • 22
                  • 0
                  • 10,767

                  #18
                  There was a donkey braying in the comment section yesterday about how "small men" has no appeal. Well, this article says it all. Loma is a huge draw, don't think he has PPV purchase power yet but this is a good sign.

                  Comment

                  • Boxnation fan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2017
                    • 1155
                    • 47
                    • 0
                    • 10,115

                    #19
                    Great numbers and thankfully the fight was great too so they'll tune in for his next fight.

                    Bring on Beltran.

                    Comment

                    • NEETzsche
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2011
                      • 8389
                      • 283
                      • 176
                      • 29,441

                      #20
                      Originally posted by bballchump11
                      That's good to hear. The average was low, but maybe people showed up late
                      Well there was nothing of any real note on the undercard to be fair. So far all of these ESPN cards have been very top heavy. I don't think the licensing fees ESPN pays are big enough to support stacked undercards

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP