Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua: Not Really Interested in Povetkin, I Hope Wilder Happens

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Mr Objecitivity View Post
    This is a public thread. If that poster wants to have a private conversation, they can do so privately. Otherwise, I am free to respond to public comments. Which means I am entitled to stick my nose wherever I wish.

    And yes, there is a huge difference between being a superior man and a superior boxer. Since being a superior boxer doesn't equate to one being the superior man.
    Well that’s the dangers you run with sticking your prying nose in a conversation that didn’t concern you. Some posters don’t mind to explain the connotations associated with PEDs and being a superior man. After all this is not a philosophy or government and politics forum so I thought his words were self explanatory . However you went on a crazy tangent all the way to frosty Moscow.

    I cannot fathom it I said that GGG is a superior being to Canelo that’s why Canelo needs PED’s that you will start talking about Mexico. In any case not a big deal and no need to get uppity about someone that doesn’t want to converse with you.

    Have a good day ✌��

    Comment


    • #62
      Exciting! AJ gets him out in 5 rounds. Sounds like it could be announced by next week. Wish it were on regular tv. If I could pick the team to call the fight-Ian Eagle of the nets/nfl, along with Berstein or Paulie. Ref would be Steve Smoger or Arthur Mercante Jr. It would be at the garden or an exotic location.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Jimmy gold View Post
        Funny thing is most wilders fans are recently jumped on his bandwagon before that they didn’t even care for wilder till he started calling out AJ and AJ was highly touted even before he became pro wilders fans just recently became wilder ****riders lol
        Theres boxing fans , then theres ............

        Wilder fans !



        Wilder first called out Joshua aggressively after he defeated Breazeale in June 2016 , this was after Joshua had complimented him and Wilder going on another mindless rant after he already planned to fight Arreola in May and made the fight in July , on short notice of course .


        Joshua then goes on to defeat Klitchko which drives Wilder to do damage control and act like the duck king .

        Wilder is the empty call out king .

        Not until actually Joshua defeated Klitchko did he gain a fanbase .


        Not sure they are actually a fanbase though as they are Joshua haters ?


        We''ll find out soon once Wilder takes that L .
        Last edited by juggernaut666; 05-15-2018, 04:46 PM.

        Comment


        • #64
          Props to AJ, he's finally coming to the conclusion that "risk free fights" does not a true champion make! Now his self-aggrandizing "museum" can have some merit to it.

          Hopefully stringent drug testing with NO CUT OFF DATE - the same olympic style RANDOM drug testing that Mayweather insisted on for himself and Pacquiao will be DEMANDEDin this fight!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
            "It's time for you to step up and give us boxing fans the fights that we demand and want to see. "


            This is so true , Joshua has yet to fight anyone of relevance unlike fan friendly Wilder .


            Just look at the resumes ?


            Joshua fought straight bums , purposely cherry picking and refusing to fight the best available .


            Wilders resume is filled with greats like Arreola , Duhaupas Szpilka and BERMANE STIVERNE .


            Not only that but he fought STIVERNE not once but TWICE . Who hss Joshua fought ? Exactly .

            Joshua simply cant compare , eventually he will have to give a fight to the boxing fans they want to see , taking on Klitchko and PARKER ????? Joshua is simply afraid to step it up .


            Ha ,what a clown that Joshua is ,he should have just refused his mandatory Takam and avoided Klitchko ......he shouldn't have even fought Martin either , hes basically a beltless champion anyway .


            He'll never be Deontay Wilder with the rate hes going and all the fans will eventually boycott him ,hes literally 20 fights in and is dragging his feet already ?

            He should have had 4 belts by his 15 th fight if he was good but hes so overrated !

            You are a Legend

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
              Well that’s the dangers you run with sticking your prying nose in a conversation that didn’t concern you. Some posters don’t mind to explain the connotations associated with PEDs and being a superior man. After all this is not a philosophy or government and politics forum so I thought his words were self explanatory . However you went on a crazy tangent all the way to frosty Moscow.

              I cannot fathom it I said that GGG is a superior being to Canelo that’s why Canelo needs PED’s that you will start talking about Mexico. In any case not a big deal and no need to get uppity about someone that doesn’t want to converse with you.

              Have a good day ✌��
              You accuse me of sticking my nose in and then do the very same thing yourself by responding to my comments which weren't even directed towards you. Perhaps follow your own advice first, before advising others?

              The words were what they were, and I understood them the way they were written. Since the word 'superior man' is totally different to the 'superior boxer' in terms of meaning.

              And anyone with common sense and basic knowledge about 21st century Earth, would know that human enhancement through technological (chemical) means is the norm. Thus, it doesn't matter whether athletes take PEDs or not. Athletes (and humans that are non-athletes) should be free to use PEDs.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
                How many uk fighters hold a belt from 154 down to featherweight? Lmao 1 maybe 2? UK boxing got saved by a Nigerian. Matter of fact how many white fighters from the UK hold a belt lmao
                There are 4, as a matter of fact. Make that 6 if you include regular and interim belts. Plus Tyson Fury, the lineal HW champ.

                We also have 3 none white champions, including AJ, who has 3 HW belts.
                Last edited by kafkod; 05-15-2018, 05:46 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by lion33lit View Post
                  Props to AJ, he's finally coming to the conclusion that "risk free fights" does not a true champion make! Now his self-aggrandizing "museum" can have some merit to it.

                  Hopefully stringent drug testing with NO CUT OFF DATE - the same olympic style RANDOM drug testing that Mayweather insisted on for himself and Pacquiao will be DEMANDEDin this fight!
                  Yeah .. the same Olympic style testing that AJ did while winning Olympic gold..

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Mr Objecitivity View Post
                    You accuse me of sticking my nose in and then do the very same thing yourself by responding to my comments which weren't even directed towards you. Perhaps follow your own advice first, before advising others?

                    The words were what they were, and I understood them the way they were written. Since the word 'superior man' is totally different to the 'superior boxer' in terms of meaning.

                    And anyone with common sense and basic knowledge about 21st century Earth, would know that human enhancement through technological (chemical) means is the norm. Thus, it doesn't matter whether athletes take PEDs or not. Athletes (and humans that are non-athletes) should be free to use PEDs.
                    Well the person you were trying to fraternise with even though he was not interested in explanations I happen to converse with so I felt I needed to step in and kindly tell you to fall back with the pressure he is not interested in entertaining your cosmic views. If it was once I would not had said nothing but you persisted. No means no. You are used to hearing that word both from men and women. Perhaps you thought if he understood your intentions for questioning him perhaps he will like you? Who knows. However you are right it’s a public forum you can speak and drop in on whoever you like.Albeit he has the right to be asked to be left alone. Just like if you said to me leave me alone I would oblige�� what with these predators online your persistence could be taken the wrong way. So mr Objectivity I suggest you don’t wear your g- strings so tight and get some rest

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Wow!!! I like the conclude part of the quote "it has to happen this year". Please let make it happen Joshua... Make it happen

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP