How many belts should each division have?

[_Rexy_]

one hundred million belts.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Who is gonna get rid of them? Boxing has no overall governing body, it's fragmented, just a load of companies doing business together. So basically the WBA or whatever are not exactly going to happily close their business when they don't have to.

That’s the problem with boxing

[brown_knight06]

agreed. Other belts are worthless.

Yes indeed.

[Larry the boss]

this.

In the jungle there's no ***ing silver champ lion or interim champ lion or alphabet leader.

You're either the king or you're not.

Preach!!!!!!!!

[LockardTheGOAT]

Just 1. The UFC only has one belt per division and everyone knows who The Man is in each weight class to beat. That's how it should be in boxing, too (interim champs notwithstanding.)

The problem is boxing has a bunch of different governing bodies, so it's a pipe dream only, unfortunately.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

1 and fewer divisions, too, but good luck.

[artfuL_]

One and only ever one.

Sadly, with so much money involved, boxing becomes sport second and business first.

[Willy Wanker]

Four isn't enough. There should be eight world champions.

And anyone with 10 or more wins becomes an interim champ by default.