Comments Thread For: The Sooner Canelo, GGG Accept They Need Each Other, the Better

[aboutfkntime]

Canelo needs Golovkin a lot more than Golovkin needs Canelo

my toy fire-engine is faster than your toy fire-engine waaaaah

[aboutfkntime]

G needs to prove that he can get a clean win over a top middleweight

Canelo needs to prove the same

oh, and some clean drug tests would also be great

[stealthradon]

So, he could fight BSJ to unify, fight Charlo, Andrade, or Charlo for respect and legacy, or fight Derevyanchenko and Murata proving once and for all that he literally had his testicles removed a long time ago.

So he could fight both Charlos?

But Charlo hardly had a fight at MW, and neither does Andrade.

[GGG Gloveking]

my toy fire-engine is faster than your toy fire-engine waaaaah

I know, you hate to admit it, but its true. Like the article said, most fans and media thought GGG won. He doesn't have anything to prove in regards to Canelo. Canelo, on the other hand, has to beat Golovkin, as well as overcome the PED accusations. Golovkin doesnt need Canelo

[aboutfkntime]

I know, you hate to admit it, but its true. Like the article said, most fans and media thought GGG won. He doesn't have anything to prove in regards to Canelo. Canelo, on the other hand, has to beat Golovkin, as well as overcome the PED accusations. Golovkin doesnt need Canelo

yea, he does.....

Weekend Review: Biggest Winners and Losers of 2017
By Michael Rosenthal
" Golovkin waited his entire career for big fights and then fell short when he got them, struggling to beat Danny Jacobs and settling for a draw with Alvarez "

without Canelo, Golovkin has one controversial win over a top MW

one

controversial

[GGG Gloveking]

yea, he does.....

Weekend Review: Biggest Winners and Losers of 2017
By Michael Rosenthal
" Golovkin waited his entire career for big fights and then fell short when he got them, struggling to beat Danny Jacobs and settling for a draw with Alvarez "

without Canelo, Golovkin has one controversial win over a top MW

one

controversial

No, he doesn't.

Despite the dubious draw on their records, the vast majority of boxing fans and media believe Golovkin beat Alvarez in their 12-round fight September 16 at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas. It was a reasonably competitive fight, though not quite the entertaining encounter we all expected.
Alvarez just didn’t do enough to win it,

[Manic Shot]

Agree or disagree: GGG for the money, Canelo for his reputation.

[aboutfkntime]

No, he doesn't.

Golovkin may not even be a top 5 middleweight

I believe that Jacobs/Canelo would definitely beat him in a rematch..... Charlo/Saunders would probably beat him..... and Derevyanchenko/Andrade could possibly beat him, or at least give him fits

but I definitely think that Golovkin can beat Murata..... the guy he wants to fight next lol

[stealthradon]

Golovkin may not even be a top 5 middleweight

I believe that Jacobs/Canelo would definitely beat him in a rematch..... Charlo/Saunders would probably beat him..... and Derevyanchenko/Andrade could possibly beat him, or at least give him fits

but I definitely think that Golovkin can beat Murata..... the guy he wants to fight next lol

They didn't beat him the first time.

What evidence have you seen that either Charlo or Saunders could beat him?

Likewise with Derev and Andrade.

[Verus]

Canelo does not need to give Golovkin another payday, but he should fight Saunders and other top middleweights like Charlo and Danny Jacobs. Standing only 5'8" tall fighting Jacobs who is 6'1" and Jermall who is 6'0" will be a tall order (pardon the pun) but that is more meaningful than a rematch with GGG.