I agree. This fight isn't even in my top 5 list for who Golovkin should fight. It's obviously not going to be Canelo, so it better be Saunders in a unification match. Anything else is just bull****.
I've defended Golovkin for the Vanes matchup. I understood why that came about. But if he fights Murata, there is no defending that.
Educate yourself before posting next time, you biased casual racist joke of a (im)poster.
Murata = Olympic Gold Medalist, sells out huge venues in Japan, he is close to e megastar in Japan and has an amazing pedigree.
Murata >> Charlo, no debate needed. Charlos best win is Trout, a gatekeeper, he fights on Broners undercard and has terrible ratings, brings no money, cant sell tickets and has beaten nobody at 160.
G should be fighting Saunders in a unification match, not this Murata guy. This does nothing for the legacy for Golovkin. Nothing. So don't try and defend this bull****.
He lost to N'DAM so how is he undefeated?? and who the hell has N'dam EVER BEATEN????? STOP!!!!!!!
Guys, I'm starting to see the problem with Larry. He doesn't actually watch boxing. He uses blatant robberies in fights that were not even close as justification.
Comment