Comments Thread For: UFC, ESPN Reach Multi-Year Deal To Stream Events on ESPN+

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scipio2009
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2014
    • 13741
    • 276
    • 64
    • 98,172

    #11
    Interesting

    5 years, $150m per year, 15 events on ESPN+, Dana White's new contender series, all related shoulder programming, the digital rights to UFC PPVs, and a dedicated half hour program on ESPN/ESPN2/ESPN3 to promo events.

    And apparently half of the deal (the best outcome for boxing would be for WWE to stay with NBCUniversal and that FOX continues on with a reduced UFC package, opening the way for PBC to fill in any lost UFC content going forward)

    Comment

    • Scipio2009
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2014
      • 13741
      • 276
      • 64
      • 98,172

      #12
      Originally posted by killakali
      a time line for what? This is facts. Tyson Fury’s next fight will likely be next. Thy already sent a press release out saying they have 6 international fights this year. Khan Lo Greco was the first.
      The YouTube show is cool, but Phil LoGreco was a punching bag, and Tyson Fury (with nothing annouced this far out) is likely being lined up to fight his own punching bag.

      Horn-Crawford is a stellar fight compared to those two, and then you have Pacquiao-Matthyssee from Axiata Arena, which will hinge on what Pacquiao has left.

      Almost no competitive fights, with the content already set for ESPN being worse as Arum focuses on simply developing his fighters his way.

      The formal deal hits the one year mark in August; how long do you figure it takes ESPN to extend things out to your 10 years?

      Comment

      • killakali
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 7197
        • 226
        • 171
        • 87,195

        #13
        Originally posted by Scipio2009
        The YouTube show is cool, but Phil LoGreco was a punching bag, and Tyson Fury (with nothing annouced this far out) is likely being lined up to fight his own punching bag.

        Horn-Crawford is a stellar fight compared to those two, and then you have Pacquiao-Matthyssee from Axiata Arena, which will hinge on what Pacquiao has left.

        Almost no competitive fights, with the content already set for ESPN being worse as Arum focuses on simply developing his fighters his way.

        The formal deal hits the one year mark in August; how long do you figure it takes ESPN to extend things out to your 10 years?
        it will be extended before the year is out. Pac-Matthysse is ESPN ppv and not the app.

        The shows on ESPN have been very good. Sure u get a stinker like Zurdos fight in February but Magdaleno-Dogboe, Valdez-Quigg, Ramirez-Imam and Beltran-Moses were excellent fights. Plus the Verdejo Lozada and Hart Nicholson co features were really good.

        With Linares-Loma coming up ESPN has put on the best cards the first half of 2018.

        Crawford-Horn is a better matchup than Garcia-Rios.

        Showtime has had a Good year with Wilder-Ortiz and Broner-Vargas and Stevenson-Jack but Dpence-Peterson, Garcia-Lipinets and Garcia-Rios turned out to be ordinary fights.

        And HBO well there isn’t much to say about except super fly was good.

        Comment

        • rwyatt05
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • May 2016
          • 31
          • 3
          • 0
          • 11,696

          #14
          Killa, a few questions for you:

          - Do you know what the Eddie Hearn matchup is on Thursday, by chance?

          - Any idea what the deal with PBC is? Right now they exist almost exclusively on Showtime. Is that their long-term plan or are they still seeking other television deals?

          Comment

          • Jsmooth9876
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2014
            • 12209
            • 2,297
            • 365
            • 72,745

            #15
            Originally posted by Scipio2009
            The YouTube show is cool, but Phil LoGreco was a punching bag, and Tyson Fury (with nothing annouced this far out) is likely being lined up to fight his own punching bag.

            Horn-Crawford is a stellar fight compared to those two, and then you have Pacquiao-Matthyssee from Axiata Arena, which will hinge on what Pacquiao has left.

            Almost no competitive fights, with the content already set for ESPN being worse as Arum focuses on simply developing his fighters his way.

            The formal deal hits the one year mark in August; how long do you figure it takes ESPN to extend things out to your 10 years?
            Fury vs Shannon Briggs coming soon according to Twitter at least

            Hope they're not planning on doing any PED testing for that one.

            Comment

            • bigdunny1
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2015
              • 14762
              • 382
              • 2
              • 167,136

              #16
              As long as this doesn't impact ESPN's commitment to boxing I'm fine with it. But if this means less boxing on ESPN in favor of UFC in the coming future that sucks. Have to see how this all plays out Bob Arum just got the ESPN deal is UFC taking away from his dates?

              Comment

              • rwyatt05
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • May 2016
                • 31
                • 3
                • 0
                • 11,696

                #17
                Originally posted by bigdunny1
                As long as this doesn't impact ESPN's commitment to boxing I'm fine with it. But if this means less boxing on ESPN in favor of UFC in the coming future that sucks. Have to see how this all plays out Bob Arum just got the ESPN deal is UFC taking away from his dates?
                No. Top Rank deal is for broadcasting, streaming and content library, ancillary programming, etc.... UFC deal doesn't include broadcasting on cable (only streaming on ESPN+). Top Rank shows on ESPN won't be cut into by this deal at all.

                Comment

                • ShoulderRoll
                  Join The Great Resist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 56171
                  • 10,136
                  • 5,032
                  • 763,445

                  #18
                  Wrong forum. This shouldn't be in the Boxing News section.

                  Move this crap to the MMA subforum.

                  Comment

                  • Boxfan83
                    The Coach
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 15831
                    • 2,098
                    • 729
                    • 160,371

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
                    So now you gotta pay for fight pass, ESPN +, and PPV

                    Thats y i stream everything now.

                    Comment

                    • BennyBlanco
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Apr 2004
                      • 859
                      • 49
                      • 13
                      • 16,690

                      #20
                      Bad news for UFC fans and for the UFC business in general.

                      1. No mention of any events on ESPN itself. So instead of being on a widely available established channel - like Fox or ESPN, like other major sports - UFC is on a streaming service that specializes in second- and third-tier games. Once again, UFC will be used to try to build an unestablished platform, like Spike - except that unlike with Spike, UFC won't be getting the prime priority placement front and center and will instead to relegated to the off-network streaming platform.

                      2. Sets up another pay wall between MMA fans and UFC content. Adding another pay wall risks alienating fans who are unwilling or unable to spend more money to watch UFC.

                      3. Perpetuates the problem of UFC oversaturation. UFC events have become generic and indistinguishable from each other. Talent pool is thin, lacking stars. And putting 15 events on ESPN+ does nothing to alleviate oversaturation and even less to build future stars.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP